HAARP grid operated by United States caused the China 2008 Earthquake 四川大地震的真相

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,323
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 22, 2010

This is genocide a mass murder of CHinese citizens!!四川大地震美国屠杀中国平民!!! Experts agree that Chinese earthquake of 5/12/08 was probably caused by in the United States and operated by the CIA. Witnesses say 30 minutes before the earthquake they could see lights in the sky above the epicenter, similar to aurora borealis, which is exactly how the use of HAARP manifests itself.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (obsidianstatue)

  • 问题是,如果这是真的美国想利用仪器对中国进行地震攻击,那美国­人为什么不用这个仪器直接震北京,直接震中南海?为什么不直接震­军营或军事地区,为什么偏偏震四川??震那有什么用?

    还是这只是恶作剧...

  • 北京,中南海有活跃地震带吗?你以为美国人是神啊,这种武器没有­指哪打哪得准确率。

  • 这种武器只能对活跃地震带产生共震,和对磁气圈发生变质,和电离­效应引导地震带熔岩暗流,这两相会导致地震带的压力得到释放,因­此地震。

  • '...was probably caused by HAARP grid...'

    wish they knew for sure

  • aurora borealis apearing in central China is NOT evertday phenomena, and close to the epiceter and only 30 min before the earthquake happened. the most possible cause is by the HAARP grid ioinizing the atomonsphere.

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 可能是日本人搞的,所以中国也搞日本,另到日本有大地震,大海啸­另到日本的核电站爆炸,核幅射泄露。Maybe Japan caused China's earth quake so China fought back with its Chinese own HAARP, big earthquake and tsuanami destroyed Japan and caused the leak of radiation, in 10 yrs Japan will have so many people die in cancer.

  • @obsidianstatue how can you prove its not special effects?

  • As much as I share your point, I have to say that these telltale signs of HAARP activity, while circumstantial, are highly indicative of an artificial cause. And come on - if you're waiting for that "smoking gun" - we'll be waiting for quite some time. As a matter of fact - it's safe to say that we may only find out the truth in hindsight - if at all. The coincidental strategic importance of these very convenient "natural" disasters has made me quite suspicious.

  • yea, granted, but it's the most serious accusation. Words such as-

    "probable" "likely" "probability" or the " most possible cause", with all due respect are just too fine.

    There needs to be proven a causal link. When an alleagation of genocide is made the evidential threshold "must" be high

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more