Bones NOT Fossils
Loading...
3,060
Loading...
Uploader Comments (sleanos)
see all
All Comments (112)
-
@sleanos Not to mention the struggles in the middle east and the Israelites. One thing an "honest" atheist can not do is explain right or wrong. Even for it to be a social agreeing would still need to borrow from the Judeo/Christian worldview. Darwinism teaches survival of the fittest so I should be able to take and get whatever I want.
-
@danjeliot Just to let you know the "Zeitgeist" video has been debunked. Look it up.
-
Amen brother!
I agree with that!!!!
-
Agreed - flood water by itself does not equal the bible being true. The bible is true in my opinion due to prophecy, archaeological finds and history that verify much of the Bible, and for life changing power that lasts found in Jesus Christ.
- Loading comment...
Loading...
I'm incredulous as to how anyone could consider this a case against evolution. Yes, there was a flood, or at least a mud slide, and some animals got trapped in a mud pit and died: but that has happened millions of times throughout history. You are grasping at straws if you take every flood ever as proof of the biblical flood. There have been dozens of floods in living memory, why aren't they proof of the biblical flood?
Blackmark52 8 months ago
@Blackmark52 We're not saying every flood is proof of the biblical flood. But based on the science we do know, there is just no way blood samples in a T-Rex or soft tissue within bones can last millions of years by natural means in earth/mudslides. This is just 1 piece of evidence to consider in favor the biblical flood or at least what science is currently doing... a serious examination of their understanding of floods/fossilization affected over time.
sleanos 8 months ago
@sleanos "based on the science we do know"
You don't know enough science. The video is about mammoths, which are mammals that lived as recently as 4500 years ago. They have found frozen mammoth meat that was still edible. What they found here were BONES, not fossils. T-Rex was a dinosaur which lived over 65 million years ago. Nobody has claimed to find blood samples or soft tissue, or even bones of dinosaurs, only fossilized remains. Get your facts straight.
Blackmark52 8 months ago
@Blackmark52 Before you make assumptions and arrogant/insulting statements, please ask more questions. Google search 'T Rex blood' and you'll see PLENTY of articles from news worthy sources and science sources about blood and soft tissue found in dinosaurs. I only talk about this since you obviously find nothing convincing about this video. Just some more food for thought.
sleanos 8 months ago
Hey sleanos. Give a video called "Zeitgeist - The greatest story ever sold" a watch. I found it helped me understand how this whole Jesus thing came about. Not saying u should convert to Atheism but give it a look.
danjeliot 1 year ago
@danjeliot Thanks. I've seen it. Much of their facts are correct, it's their conclusions that are questionable. I'd advise you investigate it further with credible evidence recorded in encyclopedias and take on a view other viewpoints from other historians and archaeologists as well.
sleanos 1 year ago