LOLITA 1997- Deleted Scene 2 Of 8
Top Comments
All Comments (127)
-
did he just.... jizz in his pants?
-
@Cigarcynic Yeah, the actress looks 30. However, I understand why they did not cast a kid...it's too repulsive. The subject matter is really dark and twisted. Makes me sick to my stomach.
-
@SugarCoatedSuicide96 adam and eve the apple? the lost of innocence
-
I can understand why they didn't keep her age so low, audiences wouldn't have been able to handle it. This scene is brilliant, by the way. He REALLY understands the character.
-
she looks older than 12
-
In the book I felt torn about Humbert until I read the passage where he commented that he had " strenuous sexual intercourse twice a day every day," and that she cried after each time. That's just assault. He just used his dick instead of his fist.
-
Damn I dint remember 12 yo to look like that XD
-
@stevesg92 he busted a nut with NO FRICTION (lol) I thought that only happened in (nocturnal emissions) WET DREAMs (lol)
-
Whoa.
Somebody needs to synch this with "Jizz in my Pants."
Anyway, this is definitely one of the best scenes in the book, and it translated really well here. I don't understand why it was pulled. I mean, it's not like it's more sexual than someone of the -other- scenes in the movie...
kennymilk 1 year ago 25
Irons really makes this role his. He's wonderful!
maliiiiiiin 1 year ago 22