Attacking William Lane Craig

Dr. Hector Avalos is an example of an atheist who seeks to ruin the reputation or destroy the career of Christians. Unfortunately, many follow his example. When I started this youtube site, I had to block over 200 atheists who have at one point or another attacked or insulted Dr. William Lane Craig. I urge everybody to stick to the point of the argument and act civil and mature. Dr. Craig is a good man, and some rather low-life individuals hate him (or seek to destroy him) just for being a Christian and a scholar.

Atheists Gone Wild?:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6555

William Lane Craig's debate with Hector Avalos (mp3s):
http://www.rfmedia.org/RF_audio_video/Other_clips/CraigAvalosResurrectionFact...
http://www.rfmedia.org/RF_audio_video/Other_clips/CraigAvalosResurrectionFact...

William Lane Craig's review of "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" (mp3):
http://www.rfmedia.org/RF_audio_video/RF_podcast/Expelled_No_Intelligence_All...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• atheists
• attack
• insult
• Ad
• Hominem
• Persecution
• Christians
• Hector
• Avalos
• Guillermo
• Gonzalez
• Iowa
• State
• University
• Religion
• Philosophy
• Expelled
• Intelligent
• Design
• Evolution

[purg4t0r1]

A 'good man' would not attempt to justify the atrocities of the Old Testament, period; but the way that Craig goes about it ( 'think about the poor soldiers who had to do all that raping and killing' ) is especially morally repugnant.

[drcraigvideos]

@purg4t0r1 Atrocities? What atrocities? There are NO RECORDS of women or children killed in Canaan, genius. Get your facts straight: watch?v=k2kSST8O93Y

[eleminatus]

@drcraigvideos oh.. pending approval, thats the christian thing on youtube!

[drcraigvideos]

@eleminatus So? If atheists can make a comment without cussing, trolling, or lying, maybe that would be helpful. Please exert self-control and be fair.

[Livelyanv]

I was wondering, do you happen to know the last name of the man who is interviewing Craig in this video?

[drcraigvideos]

Sorry, i don't know his last name.

[inf0dump]

I don't think very highly of many of Dr. Craig's arguments, but he does conduct himself quite professionally when debating. I don't know enough about Avalos or the background of this particular situation, but it's a good reminder to both sides: stick to attacking the arguments and not the people giving them.

I also appreciated the irony when the audience member yelled "well OBVIOUSLY you have no self-control!"

[observer75]

The heckler sounded like the typical bitter internet atheist who can't cope with losing and being wrong.

[XSC3]

@SpencerBenedict2nd Jesuits?

[Crobat87]

@observer75 couldnt agree more

[CR2Richet]

@observer75 Yeah I agree 

[AgApE010]

Seeing how the two top comments are both pro-Craig and have a commanding position with 77 and 11 thumbs up, I can conclude that the 82 dislikes are just atheists who click on the video to thumb it down and then quickly leave, lest they learn something.

[mygrossfetish]

@purg4t0r1 There's no evidence that any massacre happened at all, let alone a "justification" for such an event, Captain Retard.

[SpencerBenedict2nd]

Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations

Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating

The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible

Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed

[SASSJMSCBC]

Wow that guy show how atheists tends to behave(at least the ones taht I have encounter) who trow a bunch of insult to you If you disagree

[scar504]

I've never seen anyone more professional then WLC in debate. I'm not a theist I only stand for the side of logic, reason, and civil discourse. Nothing makes me more disappointed at the state of logic in humanity then to see the growing number of people who attack arguments not based on their validity, but on their own personal bias and grievances.