3D Free View or Cross eyed video Garden scene
Loading...
1,131
Loading...
Uploader Comments (nytram1309)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
curious, my old friend, why have I never seen this one before? and uploaded in 2008.
-
well this is actually quite good! but it always hurts my eyes after a while ha ha.
-
True. This is because in all ways cross eyed stereo vision will always be better quality than anaglyph. Anyway what I meant is that you dont use 2 points of view istead you use a slight delay, thats all I wanted to say, its a variation of the Pulfrich method.
-
Martyn, Dude, you'r killin' me! I teach you my amazin technique for making 3D video with a single camera and you don't even give me a shout out? Naw, I not really mad, I'm gad you like what I'm doing. Peace, Dave D.G.
Loading...
Pulfrich method using delay instead of a dark lense? Clever, but not tue 3d
TheLizard17 2 years ago
You make me laugh :) NOTHING on a 2D screen is true 3d!!!!!
nytram1309 2 years ago
This is obvious but you know what I mean by that.
TheLizard17 2 years ago
Not sure I do ... what you call 'true 3d' on a 2d screen is still missing focal length, convergent angle and head movement 3d info ... so it's not 'true' 3d as in the real world sense ... it's just an illusion. Does it really matter how the illusion is created? For my money, this illusion is a lot better than most anaglyph 3d I've seen.
nytram1309 2 years ago
Lol ... I sent you an e-mail 14 hours ago saying I'd used your technique and uploaded a couple of examples! And this afternoon I added a couple more :) It's great for situations when either the camera is moving, or there's movement in a scene ... all credit to zeondekilowatt !!!!!
nytram1309 3 years ago