Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Why Young Earth Creationists are WRONG, Part I

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
91,697
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 16, 2006

Here I show using simple observable evidence that the earth is not 6000 years old. To believe the lies of young earth creationists one needs to ignore independent evidence from astronomy, cosmology, physics, geology, and biology. In my next video I will discuss radiometric dating, including its caveats, and show how it proves the earth is billions of years old, exactly what evolution predicts.

Creationists love to cite examples of "false" rings as evidence that tree ring dating is flawed. First, false rings can be identified by two methods: alignment of multiple samples to show the ring is false; and ring density analysis to show the ring formed mid season. Second, false rings are extremely rare in bristlecone pines. The one example creationists love to cite is a publication where a scientist grew bristlecone seedlings in a climate controlled room and FORCED them to produce up to 4 false rings a year. They know, as anyone who reads this article does, that these were false rings produced under artificial conditions, yet they LIE and claim it proves bristlecones in the wild are riddled with false rings. Finally, frost rings formed during years of intense volcanic eruptions line up with the recorded years of those eruptions, indicating there are no false rings in the consensus.

Some species are more susceptible to false rings. Others are not sensitive enough to climate change to produce the variable rings required for crossdating. Creationists cite these species as examples of why tree ring science is flawed. Scientists know this. It was scientists who discovered these flaws. You know, the people who actually do the research. These species are NOT used to make long series chronologies.

References:

Creationist quote - http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp

Marker Rings and Volcanic Eruptions -
Lamarche V.c. and Hirschboeck K.K. Frost rings in trees as records of major volcanic eruptions. (1984) Nature 307, 121-126

Accuracy of Bristlecone rings -
LaMarche, V.C., Jr. and Harlan, T.P. 1973. Accuracy of tree ring dating of bristlecone pine
for calibration of the radiocarbon time scale. J.Geophysical Res. 78(36): 8849-8858.

and

Dr. Charles Ferguson 1968

To download this video go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?dwzc2mkhh1m

If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:
http://www.mediafire.com/?mmdhamkditn

Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,812)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @XDsubcompact

    Get a proper education

  • @SwornByOath If you don't believe me ... GOOGLE IT. "World's Oldest Tree" ... it is 9550 years old ... well, older than the earth ... but I am sure YECs will find some way to say "no it isn't"

  • @darththeo Uh, wrong. haha.

  • The oldest known tree as of NOW: 9550 years ... that is proof enough for the world being older than six thousand.

  • @XDsubcompact please show us evidence that hasn't been thoroughly debunked alreadythat this is the case. cite your references. explain what geologists have to gain by joining together in a secret conspiracy to fool the world into thinking the earth & universe are billions of years old. please do the same for all other fields of study that confirm this fact. please then repeat all experimentation and provide us with the correct data. this is the requirements of factuality. ok, go:

  • @XDsubcompact (1) you don't mean Christians, you mean young earth creationists. The Pope, the archbishop of and canterbury believe in evolution. (2) Some creationsist have given an exact date for the creation event - 4004 BC. (3) 11,300 years is supposed to be the earliest reliable tree ring records, not the age of the earth (he worte that in huge letters, as an aid), (4) the Rocky mountains are 80 million years old. Radiometric dating says 4.6 miilion years for the oldest rocks on earth, etc.

  • @XDsubcompact Wow, you must have gone To Liberty University.

    watch?v=2Fa9_VsM5Bk

  • watch?v=2Fa9_VsM5Bk

  • @MADbokowsky You obviously didn't watch the whole video. He specifically refers to a tree that grows only one ring per year, and the false rings or stunted growth accurately lines up with known weather/volcanic events.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more