Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 06

Seriously, Red Planet was just awful.

A few clarifications: Liquid water on the surface of Mars is an issue, because the low atmospheric pressure allows it to boil away within a few hours. The features at Cydonia Mensae are absolutely *NOT* artificial. They are perfectly consistent with well documented geological processes. The smiley crater is called Galle crater (named for J.G. Galle.) Yes, I'm aware of the controversy over whether or not water or dry landslides are responsible for Martian gullies - the point I'm making is that in attempting to study these features, scientists have produced numerical models proving that liquid water could have been involved (and is not impossible, as Spike stated.) Mars lost its magnetic field because a Giant, Magnetic Field-Eating Space Duck popped by for a snack in May, 1337. The inhabitants at the time were single-celled, and thus hadn't really developed the necessary military strategy to combat gargantuan space-faring birds.

In response to a couple more questions: The "Great Galactic Ghoul" is a NASA in-joke dreamt up to explain why so many Mars missions fail. I couldn't balance water on mars bars; I had to photoshop it because water is impossible on mars.

I jest. The picture was actually released as NASA's astronomy picture of the day in 2005 (on April 1st, of course.)

Please check out the website for NASA's Mars Science Laboratory:
http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/

Various media in this video is property of Planetside, NASA, JPL, Caltech, JHUAPL, MSSS, Brown University, DFL

Music used in this video:
Right Here Right Now (Rendanka Radio Edit) - Fatboy Slim
Acceptable In The 80s (Tom Neville Remix) - Calvin Harris
The Way It Is - The Prodigy

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• CrAP
• Debunked
• AndromedasWake
• Andromeda's
• Wake
• Creation
• Astronomy
• Propaganda
• Mars
• Spike
• Psarris
• Carl
• Baugh
• Evolution
• Science
• Religion
• God
• Atheism
• Giant
• Space
• Duck

[mjh012363]

I have a question. How can creationist who take the bible literally even support the notion of the existence of planets when the bible states that the planets are actually fallen angels (i.e. devils) worshiped by the pagens as false gods? ref. Jude 13:b; I Cor. 10:19-21.

[HeavyPhoton]

@luv4drums1 Did you noticed the phone number of the skits of the 'doctor'? That is for donations, and I do not doubt that there are enough idiots to fall for that crap and fund them, after all, if you donate to the church, you buy a piece of heaven, right?

[Huttate1]

Another great vid. Do I detect a big beat theme in the backing tracks?

[squizill]

2:43 possibly the worlds hottest scientist

[myteethareshiny]

@mjh012363 There's a very simple answer to that argument: almost all creationists have not actually studied or even read the Bible.

[gamesbok]

'What should I tell of the multitude of wild animals. So many species could not have entered Noah’s Arc.'

Journal of Amerigo Vespuchi.

[theanvilcracks]

That picture which has The Ghostbusters and Jesus in it - pure poetry man, had me laughing hysterically for quite a while...

[mignik01]

YEAH DEAL WITH IT

[MeBeMat]

Ken Ham is irrefutable evidence of the evolution of neckbeards.

[lagurash]

@mjh012363 Thanks on the explanation of the ":b". Something new! :)

All I was trying to point out was that the Jude passage wasn't relevant to the point that you were making about the planets were considered wandering stars which were fallen angels. I Cor. made that argument itself pretty decently, and Jude merely adds on that betrayers of God would suffer the same fate as those fallen angels.

Your point was fine, but I just didn't see the relevance of the Jude and Cor references to said point.

[mjh012363]

@lagurash First when referencing Epistles with just one chapter the 1 is infered in many text and the b refers to the second half of the verse so Jude 13b is Jude 1:13 second half. Second these "people who betray God" were being compared to wandering stars (ie the planets). Stars however were considered to be the angels by the ancient Hebrews thus the "wandering stars" were considered the rebellious angels or demons that followed Lucifer in rebellion since they refuse to stay in position.

[lagurash]

@mjh012363 Jude 1:13 (which I admittedly assumed you meant that by "Jude 13:b" since I couldn't find any reference to a "13:b") isn't talking about devils, or demons. It's talking about people who betray God (I.E. "the way of Cain").

However, you're right that the Cor ref does come to the logical conclusion that the planets are actually demons.