Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Sobieski at Vienna 1683 / Odsiecz Wiedeńska 1683

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
103,518
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 15, 2009

No copyright infringement intended.


"Bóg i Pan nasz na wieki błogosławiony dał zwycięstwo i sławę narodowi naszemu, o jakiej wieki przeszłe nigdy nie słyszały" - Jan III Sobieski.

Vienna was a strong fortress, but by the end of August 1683, the city was in mortal danger of collapsing to the Turkish attack. Food and ammunition were inadequate, The Ottoman siege cut virtually every means of food supply into Vienna, and the garrison and civilian volunteers suffered extreme casualties. Fatigue became such a problem that Ernst Rüdiger Graf von Starhemberg ordered any soldier found asleep on watch to be shot.

The siege by the Islamic Turks of the Christian city of Vienna in 1683 was a watershed incident in European history. Had the Turks been successful, there well might have been no Christian Europe to dominate the world stage for the next 300 years. Facing that magnitude of threat, European powers that were normally jealous and hostile to one another suppressed their mutual antagonisms to defeat the armies of Islam and their brutal Tartar Allies.

Before he set out, Sobieski had sent a letter to Innocent XI, in which he wrote: "When the good of the Church and Christianity is concerned I shed my blood to the last drop, together with the whole kingdom. Since my kingdom and I are two bulwarks of Christianity".

Sobieski said that his purpose for going to Vienna was "to proceed to the Holy War, and with God's help to give back the old freedom to besieged Vienna, and thereby help wavering Christendom."

Duke Charles, an outstanding commander, wrote about Sobieski that "his very presence means as much as the arrival of the whole army".

In the Battle of Vienna, the Turks lost about 25,000 men (plus another 40,000 at The Battle of Parkany that followed). These 65,000 soldiers constituted the cream of the Turkish cavalry on the field, while the allies lost less then 4000 killed and wounded.

For Poland-Lithuania, this was her last great moment on center-stage when she saved Europe from Islam.

The loot that fell into the hands of the Holy League troops and the Viennese was as huge as their relief, as King Sobieski vividly described in a letter to his wife a few days after the battle: "Ours are treasures unheard of ... tents, sheep, cattle and no small number of camels ... it is victory as nobody ever knew of, the enemy now completely ruined, everything lost for them. They must run for their sheer lives ... Commander Starhemberg hugged and kissed me and called me his savior."

Upon entering the abandonded Turkish tents, they found bags of beans - coffee beans revealing how Turks could fight day and night. Shortly thereafter, Polish General Kulczycki opened one of Viennas first coffeehouses and coffee quickly spread across Europe.

After the Battle Jan Sobieski entered Vienna in glory. The King and his Polish army had won lots of fame after their victory. Jan Sobieski III was not only looked upon as the savior of Vienna, but as a savior of the whole Europe from the Ottoman Turks.

The Holy League, created by several Christian states to fight the common Turkish enemy, is an example of how the European powers formed alliances when common traditions and values were at stake; some have commented that the situation was similar to the Crusades, but on this occasion, the "Crusade" was taking place in the very heart of Europe.

To commemorate Sobieskis victory Pope Innocent XI announced 12 September the day of glory of the Holy Name of Mary and to show his admiration for the Poles and their king the Pope accepted the sign of the Crowned Eagle into his papal coat of arms.

However, the victory over the Turks and the rescue of the Habsburgs did not bring Poland-Lithuania any advantages. The Commonwealth did not regain Kamieniec, the region of Podolia and the right-bank Ukraine (they returned to Poland after 16 year old war with Turkey). Yet, Austria was strengthened and it was one of Poland-Lithuania invaders in the 18th century. However, Sobieski could not foresee that. The posterity always remembered him with gratitude. King Jan III Sobieski has been rightly associated with the greatness of the former Commonwealth and as a defender of Christianity and vanquisher of the Turks.

Homework:
http://www.hussar.com.pl
http://www.thenagain.info/WebChron/EastEurope/ViennaSiege.html
http://www.polonica.net/1683-Vienna-Sobieski.htm
http://www.historyofjihad.com/sitemap.html

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @GothicKnight81 Dear GothicKnight81 - if You knew the history of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth You would know what kind of gratitude my country received from our Christian "brothers" for being antemurale christianitatis for dozens of years and shielding other Christian nations in Europe.The second thing - please show me (because I'm very curious) in which place I wrote something about honor.Things are not so easy as You would like to view them.Not from the Polish perspective anyway.Best wishes.

  • @MrTemplar1982 Please, do not insult anyone. As for the Polish clothing and armour - they were not copies in any way! They were a mish-mash of the Eastern and Western influences. The reason for that was that Poland-Lithuania was a borderland nation, which had to be able to fight both - the European and Oriental armies. Because of that, the Polish costumes (and generally warfare) evolved in a very special way and were unique. Best wishes.

see all

All Comments (429)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Our "ally in God" Austria, Germany (Prusia) and Russia 100 years later takes our lands. For 120 years Polnad was erased from map!!

    All time looking for chance to take back our freedom. It was only one true ally for Poland, only one country still recognize us on map, who??? TURKEY!!!! Yes my beloved, catholic friends only TURKEY.

    I heard that it was respect, Sultan did not destroy Polish Ambasadory only closed and hide key in Palace and Murad II was give it back in 1918 (Poland again in Map)

  • the music is just epic

  • wrong the otomans tried to take vienna twice

    this was the maximum that the otomans were capable of,

    they were overexending themselves even if they took vienna they would not

    have cept it for long.

    but if you think that what you are said is true ,if they were able to take germany,then which country do you think is next , it start with P and ends with oland

  • It was a mistake!

    The defense of Vienna is a big mistake Polish

    Defend the future occupant!?

    or occupants

    because if it fell Austria

    too soon and Germany

    One hundred years later, Austria and Germany destroyed Poland

    Partitions of Poland 1772-1793

  • Muslim animals! They were actually first to shed blood of Christians. They were first to start religious wars long before Crusades. Gauls saved Europe, then Crusades stopped their advance, later Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth saved Europe. And musims moan about their stupid rights. They are like animals, who have no thinking. Puppets! Come one, Europe, wherever you are vote for you nationalists! There is no time to waste!

  • POLAND!

  • @bielanczyk and ottomans never gave consent for the partition of poland. it's the only country refused it, from 1790 until the end of World War I various Ottoman Sultans never accepted Poland's partition. You allies, the Habsburgs, were the first on partition.

  • A true hero for all of Europe! We need another Jan Sobieski desperately!

  • @hkloss11 Akurat kierunku techniczne są odtwórcze. Potrzeba naukowców teoretyków tak, jak jest w rozwiniętych krajach. Bo właśnie to u nas kuleje najbardziej. Niby mamy dobrych specjalistów na politechnikach... I co? I nic.

  • @Rafal23pl Pomagaliśmy im po to, żebyś dzisiaj nie musiał się wstydzić, że pochodzisz z kraju, który nie dotrzymywał danych obietnic. Zwycięstwo militarne jest jedną stroną tego wydarzenia, ale przede wszystkim liczy się wspaniały etos pokazujący, że w polityce można być prawym człowiekiem. Czyż to nie jest ważniejsze w obliczu dzisiejszych czasów?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more