14. Backward induction: commitment, spies, and first-mover advantages

Game Theory (ECON 159)

We first apply our big idea--backward induction--to analyze quantity competition between firms when play is sequential, the Stackelberg model. We do this twice: first using intuition and then using calculus. We learn that this game has a first-mover advantage, and that it comes commitment and from information in the game rather than the timing per se. We notice that in some games having more information can hurt you if other players know you will have that information and hence alter their behavior. Finally, we show that, contrary to myth, many games do not have first-mover advantages.

00:00 - Chapter 1. Sequential Games: First Mover Advantage in the Stackelberg Model
38:13 - Chapter 2. First Mover Advantage: Commitment Strategy
49:25 - Chapter 3. First Mover Advantage: Why It Is Not Always an Advantage
55:53 - Chapter 4. First and Second Mover Advantage: NIM

Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://open.yale.edu/courses

This course was recorded in Fall 2007.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Backward
• induction
• Cournot
• duopoly
• Extensive
• form
• games
• First
• Mover
• Advantage
• Nash
• equilbrium
• Sequential
• Stackelberg
• Duopoly