that meeting at the Columbia university was a good sample of a free speech arena. Also a good sample of a person with lack of base for his actions. The introduction of the university president was excellent and even thought it was at the beginning it could be repeated at the end with the same result.
Why the biased question from a news journalist about 600 tickets being "sold?" There were NO tickets sold. This was free. We went even though we disagreed with him because we also believe in free speech, we wanted to see how he would defend himself, we wanted peaceful discourse and because we wanted to hear it directly from him. As proven by this journalist herself, journalism is not always free of biases.
that meeting at the Columbia university was a good sample of a free speech arena. Also a good sample of a person with lack of base for his actions. The introduction of the university president was excellent and even thought it was at the beginning it could be repeated at the end with the same result.
alveres 4 years ago
Why the biased question from a news journalist about 600 tickets being "sold?" There were NO tickets sold. This was free. We went even though we disagreed with him because we also believe in free speech, we wanted to see how he would defend himself, we wanted peaceful discourse and because we wanted to hear it directly from him. As proven by this journalist herself, journalism is not always free of biases.
Maisha2006 4 years ago