Entries: Thoroughbred Race, FAIR GROUNDS, 2010-03-13, Race 10: (Pgm-Runner-Jockey-Finish) 1-Fighter Wing (KY), Lanerie, C, finished 4; 2-Rachel Alexandra (KY), Borel, C, finished 2; 3-Zardana (BRZ), Flores, D, finished 1; 4-Unforgotten (FL), Mena, M, finished 3; 5-Clear Sailing (KY), Sellers, S, finished 5;
LIES BELOW, IF YOU ASSUME JJ IS AVOIDING ZEN GO ASK THE FUCKING TRAINER. HONEST TO GOD.
whatthefuckubrat 1 year ago
@shooter297 You're not getting it. The reason JJ gave was because it was synthetic. Well we know that was just HORSESHT!
duhru4real 1 year ago
@vsboyy25 No kidding!!!
shooter297 1 year ago
@shooter297 that kid is hard to reason and argue with
vsboyy25 1 year ago
@21Sarabi HEY DUH IS JUST A LITTLE KID AND LIKE EVERYONE IS SAYING HYPOCRITE.
vsboyy25 1 year ago
@duhru4real I'm not gonna debate the Breeders Cup with you anymore. Like I've told you before, you can't duck a race that you never intended to run in in the first place. If they had said they were gonna run in the Breeders Cup and then backed out of it, then you could say that they ducked it. Example: John Sherriffs saying that Zenyatta is gonna run against males on dirt in the Stephen Foster and then backing out and running in the Vanity instead.
shooter297 1 year ago
Duh seriously what the fuck. Said this before too-you say things like "Rachel is a good horse." Then turn around and say "Rachel was never great to begin with. "
21Sarabi 1 year ago
@duhru4real Like I said both are good in their own right. I never said great.
21Sarabi 1 year ago
@21Sarabi No I didn't!! besides Rachel was never great to begin with!
duhru4real 1 year ago
@duhru4real Yeah you did. Out of the blue you assume like most people that I think Rachel is better than Zenaytta. They are both good in their own right-who is the one inventing here???
21Sarabi 1 year ago