Panorama - Wi-fi a warning signal part 2

http://www.purewaterfreedom.com/
http://www.electropollution.org
The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile phone masts.

There have been no studies on the health effects of Wi-Fi equipment, but thousands on mobile phones and masts.

The radiation Wi-Fi emits is similar to that from mobile phone masts. It is an unavoidable by-product of going wireless.


Entire cities have become what are known as wireless hotspots.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• cell
• phones
• emf
• radiation
• electric
• magnetic
• fields
• bluetooth
• dangers
• microwaves
• health
• problems
• bbc
• domi1928
• darryl1928
• saltboy

[WeCanAllGetAllong]

Thanks for getting the info out there poster. Good series!

[flinchus]

@2011so5

a. My point still stands.

b. I know what foil does.

c. If I get cancer it will most likely be from smoking cigarettes as opposed to using a wi-fi connection.

d.Almost every clinical blind trial testing people claiming EHS or MCS has concluded that participants reacted in equal measure to placebos as they did to the things that they assert cause their symptons. The only reason the government is trying to appear cautious is so that they may cover their backsides if the unlikely is true.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell I apologize for telling you about the wifi experiment. The Blood Brain Barrier protects our brain from ammonia in our blood. The electric charge in the ammonia ion is the only thing that keeps it from crossing the BBB. The electromagnetic microwave briefly disrupts the charge. This is why people have insomnia, headaches, depression, and anxiety. These stresses are just the beginning building block for much more serious illness.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell we are not made equally and our biological thresholds are different. The embryo is effected first, then children, next would be women, then the sick or the elderly, and lastly young healthy men. We are not pieces of metal. Have you tried my experiment yet? Place your wifi within three feet of your head when you sleep. If it's so safe then you shouldn't have any problems like ears ringing, headaches, or insomnia. Just to name a few.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 yeah, people like me require conclusive proof. Go figure.

[2011so5]

It doesn't take much common sense to understand that if wifi and microwave ovens operate on the same frequency, 2.4 ghz, there could be a problem. This is why people are having problems. Then there are the sdarvell type-idiot pompass,that wait for a study to be published in a journal before they can agree with themselves. You can show them study after study and they still won't understand the relationship.

[2011so5]

To all people other than sdarvell. If you would like to see the recent discoveries of studies done by the U.S. military, Russia, Germany years ago regarding these signals, please go to the magdahavas site and click on the Zory Glacer button. There is a wealth of new information on the subject of this video.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 I said nothing of myself in that response. I don't know where your getting that impression. The fact that you think that personal experience has more value than anything indicates why you don't currently have the skills necessary to interpret these papers. Anecdotal evidence is one of the most inefficient and ineffective methods of obtaining data. Understanding why that's the case is also an essential part interpreting these papers. Seriously leave it to your doctor.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell It looks to me that you think more highly of yourself than actual reality shows. I find that a personal experience is much more invigorating than just discussing a hearsay. 

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 The concept i was referring to is quite clearly the scientific method. Your not capable of understanding the nature of academia in order to judge correct or incorrect knowledge. This is first required before reading academic papers. Without this fundamental knowledge you can not make accurate assumptions about that information. Your doctor has this understanding. Leave it to him to do for you.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Yes, I do understand the concept very much and you would too if you took the time to research the information given. I bring something more than "your wrong" "your a kook" "your unqualified" . I bring a ton to the table and you have brought nothing but insults.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 I don't need to know the subject. You don't need to listen to the ramblings of kooks to understand that its invalid knowledge. There is no way you could first read all content on a subject and then make a merit based decision on its validity. Its why we have processes that do this for us. The Journals I mentioned. Many uneducated people are convinced by the letters after peoples names. I have letters after my name too. The letters don't make you more or less correct.