600Hz TVs are a sham!

yes, there are advantages in terms of comfort to screens with higher Hz ratings, but I guess they figured "comfortable to watch!" was less interesting a sales point than a blatant lie.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• 600Hz
• Hertz
• tv
• screen
• television
• sony
• bravia
• panasonic
• NeoPDP
• film
• movies
• video
• frame
• rate
• frames
• per
• second
• sham
• hoax

[MrJbrebel56]

dude, are you an asshole. Do a little more research you retard. 600 hz is the refresh rate and it DOES make a difference. You are just a retard that is talking out of his ass. Again, do some research and get a haircut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Magnulus]

@MrJbrebel56 Why is it always the asshole who starts calling people assholes? Perhaps you should pay a little more attention and scream less? I never said it made no difference at all. All I say is that it won't magically fix motion blur because motion blur has nothing to do with refresh rates and everything to do with the source material.

[alexaiverson]

@Magnulus Source material? You sir, are a fool. You should take this down, you make yourself look stupid. Ill enjoy though.

[Magnulus]

@alexaiverson In what way exactly?

A TV with high refresh rates will not magically fix motion blur in the "source material" or original footage, if you prefer that phrasing. A TV could have a Million Hz refresh rate (plasma OR LCD) and it wouldn't make a difference to motion blur. It can eliminate GHOSTING but that's not what the advert's photo suggests.

Also, thanks for latching on to one bad phrasing. English is my second language so I'm a bit off sometimes. How good's your Norwegian?

[TheMob1080]

Wow this guy is dumb. He has never watched a Blueray or anything in HD, yes its true if your watching regular TV it will not matter, but regular tv is not what a HD TV is for, its for HD VIEWING. I love people like this idiot who spew out shit that he knows nothing about and tries to make himself look smart. Good job dude, for missing the whole point of HD TV, BTW you need to relax a little, your going to have a heart attack if you keep getting so frustrated over things your dont understand.

[Platibus666]

@903harman How do you check for FPS in a PS3? And by the way, COD are one of the very few games that run at 60FPS, so PS3 games don't usually run at that framerate, it's very rare

[lern2swim]

@Rrrrrrrriot Wrong.

[lern2swim]

@TheMob1080 I don't necessarily agree with what he said in the video, but you're also incredibly misinformed. Blu rays are still `24/25 or 30 fps. Even video games are 60fps at most. Creating a TV that can do higher than 60hz is only useful in creating one that can do all of those frame rates just as well. 600hz is way higher than necessary for that. So, in actuality, you're just as dumb, if not dumber than he is.

[CJAdy]

Good thing I play a ton a first person shooters then, plasma here I come!

[Rrrrrrrriot]

They do not transmit at 25 fps now that most countries use DVB-T... they would transmit at 25 fps if you lived in the 80's

[Rrrrrrrriot]

@khangu262 depends what you are looking at hz is how many flashes the screen makes a second, ie if it has a 120hz it only flashes 120hz times per second meaning you will see a limited amount of frames per second. Assuming you are going into a target out of a ghetto they will play a bluray movie on their tv's showing 120+ fps meaning that 600hz will be far superior.

[khangu262]

@MrJbrebel56 e, go to target, take a look at the 600hz vs 120hz and see that the 120hz is better.