Michael Crichton on the Unproven Dangers of Secondhand Smoke
Top Comments
All Comments (235)
-
Damn! He should have been president! He's smarter than any of those dipshit politicians! XD
-
@Glasya666 Since ETS cannot be quantified, and all the studies are inconclusive ( as many studies show an inverse correlation, or no increase risk), we must move on to first hand smoking- which has also never been proven using good science. I am NOT saying it cannot cause problems- anything can cause problems. But there are no randomized studies or animal studies that have proven it is bad. that is just the way it is.
-
@Rodney21a He didn't smoke. Non smokers die of cancer all the time. even the majority of "smoking related" cancers occur in people who have quit. Get a clue.
-
He DIED of THROAT CANCER.... For a Guy who so believed in KARMA he sure got it in spades
-
There have been hundreds of peer-reviewed studies showing the dangers of second hand smoke. Michael Crichton doesn't know what he is talking about.
-
Maybe this is off-topic, but was anyone else severely disappointed with his new book, 'Pirate Latitudes'?
-
There are millions of seniors alive today ages 50-100 that smoked & ones who were around smokers (long before these stupid bans) that are alive & well. Is that not hard proven evidence that smoking does not kill you? or do you anti's need a good kick in the ass to learn?
-
At time 2:32, look at the blank stares of those little liberals, future street union protestors. Unions exist to rip off the tax payer, who is cut out of the negotiations. It's a workers monopoly, as if all the airlines got together and decided to charge $5,000 per ticket, so they could have a better life. They'll protest to stuff their own wallets!! There's no noble cause there. It's all greed. But liberal students can't see through the rhetoric. Smug idiots who will bankrupt us all. Hate 'em!!
-
@mosiefool You must be on some heavy shit man.
"Passive smoking" in other words is a total lie, invented by health and safety agitators and connived in by the state in order to railroad through an iniquitous law by pretending it's about the "public interest".
davros59 1 year ago 8
He's spot on,
:( if only there were more people around like Crichton
Jonnymont 2 years ago 8