Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Good WORK Lord Monckton. I hope that you will noted and honoured as you should be. Please continue until this matter of Global Warming is sealed to never return again. So that we can all get back to focusing on local pollution - were we actually can effect change to our local environment, without needing a global carbon tax to do it. Cheers to you Monckton
The simple rule of thumb is that more smoke exposure is worse for you, and that a little is worse than none at all. The fact that the effects of second hand smoke fail to show up in a statistical analysis testifies to the petty insignificance of those effects. But I agree that thes junk science methods are a bad precedent, which is also used with other political issues like global warming and domestic violence, where hysteria prevails over facts.
statistical significance is not the issue here, because the question of whether or not there is any effect at all has no value in this context. If direct smoking increases cancer risk, then why wouldnt breathing in second hand smoke? It is not a question of causality but of quantity. How much smoke exposure is bad for you? How much does it increase your risk? How much should your own personal freedom be compromised in the interest of public good or public taste?
When Crichton says 2nd hand smoke DOES NOT cause cancer, he is right. However, he still wants to outlaw people who do smoke. I fail to see the logic in this. Because he, in his own words "don't like it when people smoke", he'd take part in making it ILLIGAL to smoke certain areas. Maybe he doesn't like smoke after a meal, but some people do. Why are his likes and dislikes better than others making it morally acceptable for him to makes law to outlaw smokers. Let it be said that I am a NONSMOKER.
You will not believe what I discovered, I advice all to read about this religion Called ( ISLAM) it will surprise you and you will be passion of it You can search for the Islam thru internet or reading some books
You will lose nothing
If you want to know meaning of love and soul peace read about this religion
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I hope that you will noted and honoured as you should be.
Please continue until this matter of Global Warming is sealed to never return again.
So that we can all get back to focusing on local pollution - were we actually can effect change to our local environment, without needing a global carbon tax to do it.
Cheers to you Monckton
The fact that the effects of second hand smoke fail to show up in a statistical analysis testifies to the petty insignificance of those effects. But I agree that thes junk science methods are a bad precedent, which is also used with other political issues like global warming and domestic violence, where hysteria prevails over facts.
If direct smoking increases cancer risk, then why wouldnt breathing in second hand smoke?
It is not a question of causality but of quantity.
How much smoke exposure is bad for you?
How much does it increase your risk?
How much should your own personal freedom be compromised in the interest of public good or public taste?
( ISLAM) it will surprise you and you will be passion of it
You can search for the Islam thru internet or reading some books
You will lose nothing
If you want to know meaning of love and soul peace read about this religion
I Love you all
:( if only there were more people around like Crichton
Another mind numbed robot. Never let the facts get in the way of your religion of Second Hand Smoke.