First part shows how we prepared test tubes. Syringes used to ensure preciseness and fairness. Feel free to skip this part and go to performance test part.
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
Test tube 1 (no xxl):
Starts at 60, goes to 74 towards the end before sputtering out. distance = 34.
Comments - Engine warming up accounts for initial rise from 60 to 74. Stable speed should be 74.
Test tube 2 (with xxl):
Starts at 74, slowly moves up, reaches 80 around 75% of way through, finishes at 82. Distance is 40.
Comment - Takes time for xxl to lubricate engine and crack the fuel. Prolonged usage with xxl should stabilise at 82. Next time I think we'll have 1 more tube of XXL-powered fuel to show that it gets up to 82 very quickly after start.
Test tube 3 (no xxl):
Starts at 75, goes up momentarily to 79, comes back down and settles at 73/74, momentarily gets to 82 just before sputtering out. Distance is 40.
Comments - machine still has remnant benefits (eg., engine cleaning and lubrication) from previous xxl-enhanced fuel. Stabilized speed is 74, same as test tube 1. This test achieved similar distance to previous test tube due to remnant xxl effects. Next time I think we'll add 1 more tube of no-XXL fuel so that the long-term state of no-XXL fuel is more obvious.
Test tube 4 (with xxl, and with more xxl added shortly after start):
Starts around 75, goes up soon and settles soon at 81, then after a while (when additional xxl has had time to work) it goes up to 91, gets to 93 around half way through, settles back to 91/92, occasionally touches 95, distance is 51.5.
Comments - clear demonstration showing that the more xxl added, the higher the power (in the form of speed) and the greater the cost savings (in the form of extra distance).
Note: If throttle is adjusted down so that speed remains constant, then we should get even more distance (and hence more savings).
All Comments