D-Day Stephen E Ambrose - Book Review
Uploader Comments (TriumphTR5)
All Comments (24)
-
there is loads of criticism against him. that alone calls into question how credible this "historian" is...
-
No, why would you think that. My grand Fathers two brothers died in WWII. For the British.
-
@MrGavinPatton ....And I thought it was Easy Company that won the war. I wonder where all that American gun power and Russian manpower was when the Germans suffered their first defeat of WW2 in the Battle of Britain? Wasn't that when the US was still selling weapons to the Nazis and the Russians were allied with them? Undisputed? Just go and ask a Canadian, Pole, Aussie, Indian, New Zealander etc. if they agree with you. Ambrose was a hack who wrote populist pap for the ignorant.
-
warchronicledotcom/correcting_
the_record/ambrose_coxswains.h tm -
Ambrose did meet Eisenhower three times, but certainly not the 100 hours Ambrose claims. He lied about other things as explained at this US universirt site: wwwdothnndotus/articles/126636
dothtml -
ololo british bro is mad
-
Thanks. :)
-
@TriumphTR5, the Historical world would be better off without you.
Having watched your video it is clear from your tone and manner that you are blinded by a dislike of Mr Ambrose. However having said that I think your true dislike lays with the fact that American gun power won WWII. This upsets the British so much but it is undisputed anywhere else. US gun power, industry, including Higgins landing cafts, plus Russian man power won WWII.
MrGavinPatton 4 months ago
@MrGavinPatton
Ok chum, if you say so.
TriumphTR5 4 months ago
Wow, what a broad sweeping statement. You're wrong, by the way but, care to expand on that?
TriumphTR5 1 year ago
He was never in the US military in WW2.
TriumphTR5 1 year ago