Picasa vs. Windows Live Photo Gallery

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,434
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2008

A Mainstream Guide ( http://mainstream-guides.com )that sets up a face-off between the two best programs for organizing, editing, and sharing your digital photos.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Check out also Daminion (the former name is PicaJet 3.0). It allows to automatically sync image annotations into the image metadata. And the more important I can provide True multi-user access to my image archive library. And even more important the standalone version is free :)

  • I don't like how you can only turn up highlights and shadows in picasa and there is no direct saturation tint and temperature slide adjuster to speak of. I'm sticking with windows live photo gallery. To bad because I really liked the album organization in picasa.

    So far the only thing I don't like that google made. :(

  • Even though Picasa has more features. The tagging and saving the editing feature is clunky. Windows Live Photo Gallery is more streamlined due to the 'Previous Versions' (Shadow Copy) integration

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more