Disproving the Pre-Tribulation Rapture: Acts 3:21

A brief explanation of the Pre-Tribulation rapture belief and an examination of two verses: Acts 3:21, 2:34 both which counters this popular belief.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Eschatology
• Pre-Tribulation
• rapture
• Acts
• 3:21
• 2:34
• Apocalypse
• Schofield
• JND
• Derby
• reference
• Bible
• Madhi
• end
• of
• days
• Dijjal
• Second
• Coming
• Armageddon
• Revelation
• gospel
• truth
• Mid-Trib
• pre-Trib
• beast
• false
• prophet
• salvation

[MrLimeyBob]

Folks as with all my videos on my channel, a thumbs up would be greatly appreciated, thank you.

[snoopyredhat]

I'm afraid your point has fallen at the first hurdle. Acts 3:21 has been explained & understood by bible scholars for many years. As it is too long to explain here I will simply direct you to Ken Onweller's study. It was in-fact this very verse that convinced him of a pre-trib rapture of true believers! Google: VW: Why the "last" trump CANNOT be the "seventh" Hope this helps your study. Shalom

[MrLimeyBob]

@snoopyredhat I don't do web sites, but if you look at the conclusion of all of my videos you'll find my e-mail address and if you want to summarise the reason why I am wrong then I'll read it if its not some rediculous cut and paste job of some inordinate length.

[svweichert]

Amen preach it. So many not wanting ot pick up there Bibles and read it!

[craqqer]

thing is there are also many verses that support pre tribulation rapture

[2222tomi]

Isaiah 26  19 - 21

[bondagebreaker7]

this is a good argument but you also seem to imply that you're premillennial.

[kingdomwarrior1000]

You are correct. The Bible leaves no room for a pre-trib rapture. Some scholors approach prophesy like attorneys - combing over the "contract" looking for loopholes. If they try hard enough they seem to find them.

But they won't hold up in Court.

[KJVWordofGod]

@MrLimeyBob "don't do web sites"? So you don't read, huh? You alone have all knowledge. You are wrong because you are wrong. The bible refutes you. You use the Word improperly and as a child. I don't know the reason you are wrong....maybe you're just pigheaded. snoopyredhat was nice and tried to help you and you "don't do web sites".....so I'll be blunt and tell you that you are a fool.

[bondagebreaker7]

Never considered it, but Acts 3:21 disproves premillinnealism as well.

[October31st1517]

Excellent job bob.

[Blogrich55]

#2. He spoke these words around 33 AD A generation is 40 years. The prophecy had to be fulfilled by 73 AD Jerusalem WAS destroyed in 70 AD

a. Luke 21:20 refers to the abomination of desolation of in Matthew and Mark as "Jerusalem encompassed with armies."

b. Letting scripture interpret scripture we KNOW what the abomination of desolation WAS. Luke told us.

c. Tommy Ice and others admit Luke speaks of 70AD but think Matt and Mark of a future event :(

d. Impossible! They are the synoptic Gospels