Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The YES on prop. 8 ignoramuses

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,124
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2008

The pro-proposition 8 people feel they need to protect 'traditional marriage' in order to provide a father and a mother for our children.

Do these people realize that 'marriage' doesn't have one single thing to do with children and how they are raised, whether they prosper better when they have a mom and a dad? Same-sex marriage is about two people, not three or more, or between animals and people as O'Reilly likes to claim.

Two same sex persons, who decide they want to form a union, and one or both already have children, would these children be better off with just a single parent, or as wards of the state? Or raised by this same sex couple?

Should a same sex couple be denied the right to adopt a child when it has been shown that a child is just as well off being raised within a same-sex marriage as within a traditional marriage, or should this child remain as a ward of the state and never realize the loving care (s)he may receive within a loving relationship?

Sonya Eddings Brown (protectmarriage.com) elaborates that on the last page of the decision, the judges lined out the words 'between a man and a woman', which changed 'marriage' for everyone.

So does this mean that all marriages in California are now different from what they were at the beginning of 2008? In what way are they now different?

Just what is it these people really want to accomplish?
a. Heterosexuals are better, worse, or just different when it comes to civil rights?
b. It annoys them that those two people half-way across the country are 'married'?
c. They want to reserve the word 'marriage' just for themselves?
d. They are homophobic and believe that their marriage is now worth less because of those two guys down the street who are also married?
e. They claim that they are willing to give gays the same rights as they have, except for the word 'marriage'. Well thank you kindly, but that right is not yours to give, homosexuals are already guaranteed equal rights under the constitution.
f. They do not realize that same-sex marriage is not equal to gay-marriage.
g. They don't realize that 'marriage' is usually a two-step process. The civil ceremony usually comes first, and their god has nothing to do with that, then there is the religious ceremony, where each denomination can decide on their own whether they want to perform the marriage rites prescribed by their religious belief.

Sexual orientation, like race, national origin and sex should not be discriminated against, because these qualities are not choices that an individual makes.

In conclusion, is a child better raised by two same-sex parents, or by two same sex union members?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ronh1936)

  • If your church/religion does not condone same-sex marriage, let them go to a church that will.

    But marriage in a civil ceremony has absolutely nothing to do with your religion/belief/morals. It is for the purpose of civil matters, financial, economic and personal. Religion should stay out of this part of the 2-part process of marriage.

    Also, marriage ceremony has nothing to do with children. Making children is a separate ceremony, usually performed in private.

Top Comments

  • Stupid Bitch. Kids grow up to be gay people too, and EVERY gay person was once a child. She wants to pretend she is protecting children when she is really harming them.

  • Correction: The ignoramuses have spoken. Just like they did when they voted against interracial marriage, giving blacks the vote, and desegregating schools.

    Democracy sometimes backfires, when the majority are ignorant and ill-informed, as history shows.

see all

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why is it when something is a civil matter, people bring religion into it? this isn't a religious matter so why soo off topic... adam and eve wtf?

    separation of church and state?? WHY IS THAT SO HARD TO GET!!!

    religious people could be smart but they throw it all away in learning false history so called bible... lol read a damn science book. No such thing as eve, her name was LUCY.

  • hai can't wait any longer! Rescue meh from my boredom

  • they were duped by the pro prop h8 people

  • she came from a mother and a father look how bad she turned out we must legalize same sex marriage

  • this is the whitest bitch ive ever seen... maybe her husband isnt fucking her enough so she has nothing better to do.

  • What's this bitch talking about? It's not gays but divorce that runs havoc on marriage. What don't she run a campaign against divorce?

  • What morons, what an hideous-looking woman?

  • we will have marriage in 2 years or less!Time is on our side,soon will all loving couples in california have the right to marry!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more