THE CORPORATION [4/23] Externalities

Realize this the argument is the criminal unconstitutional act of creating the legal person. I can bet my top dollar none of you know what the difference of the terms "State of Ohio" & "Ohio state" or why you need to pay a corporate body to get a license to drive when in the constitution conveyance is an inalienable right. This documentary just scratched the surface. Buy a law dictionary & the U.S Republic Constitution and see why u became a corporation the moment your mother/informant had you.

birth certificates being issued with SSN matching a name in all capital letters is proper description for property.
Licensing: each state retains ownership by way of holding all, date of origin certificates, from the manufacture.
"State of Ohio" signifies no sovereignty, being just a part of a whole, while Ohio state could establish grounds for succession if desired.
the saying is 'bottom' dollar, not top. let me know if my answers are close please, your knowledge is outstanding Avabz

"State of" is opinion or fiction it has not cognate to science of law or self. e.g Kofi is in a state of psychosis, now that is an opinion or deduction, so to qualify the statement, the reality must be scientifically determined using facts. Then we can say kofi is in a psychotic state or otherwise. Whenever you hear "state of" before the object e.g Ohio that is a fictional jurisdiction and the only way it exists is in our minds because we agree with the legal terms not lawful terms.

Also "state of" refers to something non-permanent and changeable unlike your guaranteed inalienable rights to conveyance. To not move is to die. So a fictional jurisdiction cannot have power over you unless you become a corporate entity i.e an individual with your name in all caps, individual with a colour instead of status, an individual with a slave name, with a birth/ marriage certificate there are so many traps to put and individual in artificial jurisdiction under the colour of law&arms.

Awesome knowledge Avabz, thank you

Yes, that's right, but most of these ridiculous set up law definitions, come from the British system that this country and its' law are still under. This is why lawyers take a B.A.R exam, in court settings, this means "British Accredited Registry" exam. Why NOT an American Accredited Registry exam ? Well, because there is NO independent American system, this U.S. corporation has ALWAYS been just a mere British colony, every president in history has been pimped by the royalty of England.

I agree but check this out, if you study law in Britain you cannot practice it in the U.S corporation jurisdiction, why? Cos you will have to be tought the truth about the corporation and you also will have to become a member of a group of knights or masons while swearing allegiance a oath of secrecy. The U.S corporation is an illegal occupying colony of Rome actually, Britain is a roman colony which is why all monarchs bow to the pope. All European rulers are related by blood or masonic oath.

Oh yeah, "all roads lead to Rome" is the old slogan for this type of truth. I totally agree.

And anyone can go live in the woods with a tent. but nobody wants to give up things like indoor plumbing, toilet paper, refrigeration, Air Conditioning and heat, modern medicine, something but candlelights and books. We have evolved out of a short brutish existence and the reason is invention and mass production.

Recent psychological studies show that people from 19th century could've had a level of happiness quite similar to ours. The point is made: no cars, microwaves, cellphones, computers, Internet, etc., etc. Creating needs that only corporations can satisfied doesn't prove anything in their favor. The harm is quite worse: exploitation, pollution, corruption, modern slavery. I'm writing this from a PC using Internet, but living in a world without'em would make us miserables, less humans?