FS9 - Bad Cross-Wind Landing in a C172SP
Uploader Comments (MrPilot1230)
Top Comments
-
PUT SIM IN THE TITLE.
-
A lot of us simmers are also real pilots so i would suggest not leaving comments like that, it only makes you seem very very immature.
All Comments (58)
-
18kt crosswind component...you would have made it down if you would have held that crab just a little longer...
-
well, I gonna comment on this one.... flightsim, REALLY it was only 20 degrees crosswind... and this is a SIM... you couldnt work it out?
I'm not a good pilot by any definition of the word... but THAT was CRAP. If I pulled off a landing like that POS my funding would get pulled
-
that was a good landing, just not a good approach
-
@MrPilot1230 - Gusting conditions do make any landing more challenging, but a 30 knot wind 20 degrees off the nose is only a x-wind component of 10 knots. Also, there isn't a "recommendation" of max x-wind, only max demonstrated. It even states in the POH that "this is not a limitation". I've taken off sideways in Mr. Cessna's fine little craft. Just sayin'
-
You're getting more dislikes because you're not putting "FS2004" in the title.
-
when i was a student pilot doing solo circuits, i was landing into sun, with stronger winds than that, done a perfect approach but when i flared it gusted, i got thrown to the edge of the runway, skidded like a bitch and did a go-around like one... thought i was gonna die, this isnt a half hearted thing u know
-
@1085oliverda are you a real pilot?
-
Try not be offended but that was shit.
-
oh ffs, could people please put some indication in the title to tell us weather or not this is real or flight sim :(
-
@SuperdicaFlyer trust me its really hard to overstress a cessna
wind 300, runway orientation 320...
thats not too bad of a crosswind component
acousticness 2 years ago 2
Did you calculate the gust factor into that? Also compare it to the C172's POH that only recommends (by a test pilot) no more than a 15kt x-wind component for the aircraft? The wind Direction is only one of several factors.
MrPilot1230 2 years ago 2
this just goes to show you why the FAA will not use a sim like this to count towards recurrency. Just imagine doing this for real trying to stay within the aircraft's rated performance. I love flight sim but doing it for real kicks but.
unclefester420 2 years ago
Agreed very much. :)
MrPilot1230 2 years ago
don't use your rudder until the end, use aileron to stay on center, and then when you get about 100-50 ft off the ground use rudder to swing the plane straight. i know for real life experience...lol.
jdatt2634 2 years ago
Thanks but I know that too. I do have my pilots license and have been flying for 5yrs and over 200hrs of flight time.
MrPilot1230 2 years ago