@spydrworks ...not everything. I'm actually a bio major and im not arguing, im just letting you know the reality. you must have misread any resources you have. DONE
@spydrworks you fail so hard...AROWANA is another term for any fish in the family osteoglossidae. just like how bichir is another term for those in Polypteridae. Your analogy is not at all what i was trying to say. Just; just stop arguing and read ANYTHING about arowana online
@kcamerons ,,,That's a family name, not genus or species, so how can they all be arowanas? You just failed the most basic of logic. If we were to change the names appropriately, the analogy would go "If all dogs are mammals and some mammals are cats, does it really follow that all cats are dogs?" And besides, it's a "noob" thing to have one in the first place. Do you really think these are happy animals in a see through box? And often quite too small. Even a large aquarium is way too small.
@spydrworks "arowana" is a term used for all fish in the family Osteoglossidae....I know plenty about them; such as the fact that Scleropages jardini is also called the "australian arowana" (because its a kind of arowana). I know that there are two subfamilies and different genus, etc, but they are ALL arowana; asian aro's, australian aros, african aros, and SA aro's...even arapaima gigas are technically arowana. Nice try with the whole "outranking resources," lol, but you failed.
@kcamerons ...Evidently you lack knowledge in evolution and biology. My resources out rank yours. They are all in the same family (Osteoglossidae), but vary in subfamilies, genus and species. This is a line of fish that evolved a very long time ago that have since changed separate from each other. Those closer in evolutionary relation may actually produce viable offspring, but beyond that reproduction should be impossible or produce sterile young.
@spydrworks well it is an arowana...so you don't know what youre talking about, so you dont have regardable experience, so youre principally a noob when it comes to aro.
1 minute 40 and nothing happens until 1:37? Seriously?
TDFrost 9 months ago
@spydrworks ...not everything. I'm actually a bio major and im not arguing, im just letting you know the reality. you must have misread any resources you have. DONE
kcamerons 1 year ago
@kcamerons ...Do you believe everything you read online? My resources come from the bio-sciences and you're the only one who is arguing. I'm done.
spydrworks 1 year ago
@spydrworks you fail so hard...AROWANA is another term for any fish in the family osteoglossidae. just like how bichir is another term for those in Polypteridae. Your analogy is not at all what i was trying to say. Just; just stop arguing and read ANYTHING about arowana online
kcamerons 1 year ago
@kcamerons ,,,That's a family name, not genus or species, so how can they all be arowanas? You just failed the most basic of logic. If we were to change the names appropriately, the analogy would go "If all dogs are mammals and some mammals are cats, does it really follow that all cats are dogs?" And besides, it's a "noob" thing to have one in the first place. Do you really think these are happy animals in a see through box? And often quite too small. Even a large aquarium is way too small.
spydrworks 1 year ago
@spydrworks All osteoglossidae are arowana. Jardini is an osteoglossidae. Jardini is and arowana.
kcamerons 1 year ago
@kcamerons ..If all arowanas are Osteoglossidae and some Osteoglossidae are jardinis, does it really follow that all jardinis are arowanas?
spydrworks 1 year ago
@spydrworks "arowana" is a term used for all fish in the family Osteoglossidae....I know plenty about them; such as the fact that Scleropages jardini is also called the "australian arowana" (because its a kind of arowana). I know that there are two subfamilies and different genus, etc, but they are ALL arowana; asian aro's, australian aros, african aros, and SA aro's...even arapaima gigas are technically arowana. Nice try with the whole "outranking resources," lol, but you failed.
..noob
kcamerons 1 year ago
@kcamerons ...Evidently you lack knowledge in evolution and biology. My resources out rank yours. They are all in the same family (Osteoglossidae), but vary in subfamilies, genus and species. This is a line of fish that evolved a very long time ago that have since changed separate from each other. Those closer in evolutionary relation may actually produce viable offspring, but beyond that reproduction should be impossible or produce sterile young.
spydrworks 1 year ago
@spydrworks well it is an arowana...so you don't know what youre talking about, so you dont have regardable experience, so youre principally a noob when it comes to aro.
kcamerons 1 year ago