inertia engine

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,154
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 9, 2008

inertia engine. Possible way to power vehicles

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kamalmichael)

  • obviously, for propelling forward earthbound devices (such as cars) it has a very low ratio of energy transfer and produces unstable movement

    concerning space propulsion, in space there is virtually no friction and therefore, due to the 2nd law of Neuton, all forces would cancel out each other, destroying any point in propulsion

    generally, space propulsion (ignoring relativity as very difficult to implement) is impossible without a process of mass loss

  • @maniopas a very good comment. It can be argued space propulsion does not require a process of mass loss. Take the earth.for example.. its travelling through space without a loss of mass. Maybe making things heavier than they should be thus warping the fabric of space time ,like the sun does, could result in propulsion without a loss of mass. Its interesting if you bounce a spring up and down on a scale, it appears to lose and gain weight.

  • There is a vector lever force acting at the back that because of the surface twists it foreward just a little with very high rpm but very small increments. A real system must not use a hard surface. If this really worked it could be used for space propulsion. This trick is bad for the few real working space propulsion systems.

    See approachconcepts com

  • @johnroach1 im not going to dispute what you are saying cos i know you were an engineer and you are interested in propulution. Hope you dont mind but im gonna send you a less then perfect video about something i called a compass engine...

  • so what ? measure the distance it moved in say 5 seconds,..then...add some bloody wheels to it and run it for 5 seconds..see how far that gets in 5 seconds.

    Its only an offcentre weight on an DC motor......

  • @BunkyOhare This is nothing but to prove forward motion. Wheels is not a good idea for this particular because of size. It wud give forward motion with a larger vehicle on wheels as seen on other u tube vids. However i have concerns that a spinning motor is not efficient in the sense that as it spins, it becomes a generator cancelling out some volts.

Video Responses

This video is a response to new invention ..spring engine
see all

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @maniopas newtons laws are not brokin for inertia propusion to work. The direction of the twin inertias are changed to get one direction . ineffiecient even in zero gravity.. been provin in water. much to inefficient for a car

  • @kamalmichael as long as the required amount of energy is present to keep them that close. As far as the sun goes, it is definitely constantly taking severe mass loss.

  • @kamalmichael The earth is traveling after an initial propulsion because of previous impacts/eruptions, (change in mass involved).

    The trick with the spring on the scale is the fact that after a foreign energy source bounced it on the scale, when the spring expands and contracts (don't forget gravity) it puts more or less pressure on the scale.

    Lastly, modern science can not warp space time, and protons, electrons, and neutrons do not care how close they are together (the weight of the object)

  • @wringeaux if it works on surface land, stands to reason it will work on another sea surface, duh

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more