Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nick Kollerstrom - I am not a holocaust denier

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,936
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 23, 2010

http://www.terroronthetube.co.uk
Nick Kollerstrom, a science historian, has been labelled a holocaust denier and yet he says that is far from the truth. Nick has researched evidence about the gas chambers at Auschwitz and apparently there is some discrepancy in the cyanide residue in the chamber walls. What Nick wants is an open discussion about this discrepancy and what it may mean. He says vehemently that he's not denying the horror and extermination that occurred in the Nazi death camps and hopes that people can begin to recognise that he is only interested in understanding the evidence. It is this extraordinary attention to detail which has enabled him to compile the huge amount of data, cross referencing and minutiae to write his book Terror on the Tube - declaring that the July 7th London tube bombings must have been false flag terror and a conspiracy.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Just another jewish scam, in a long line of jewish scams. I personally think jews are genetically incapable of telling the truth - ergo, every time they express a positve view on a matter, I know it must be good for jews and bad for non jews , and the same goes for when they are on the attack , I know it must be the opposite.

    As far as maxims go , I know its quite gauche , but, the bastards aint fooled me for a long while !

    Good luck my friend, and...don't visit Europe !

  • The Holocaust is an hoax; But abortion of 200.000 babys  in their mother's wombs in France every year since 1975 is not an hoax; And it ist not an hoax that the jewess Simone Jacob-Weil forced this "law" there; And it is not an hoax that jew Maimonides introduce abortion in Europe;

see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The problem

  • Up

  • Yo

  • @koertje I'm better at chemistry and physics than when I did them at college because its mainly an issue between my mind, the routine and a steady climb of learning and understanding how many ways I'm liable to forget little things; after studying not converting to long-term memory fast enough; converting it to something interesting enough to hold in mind; I like puzzles and problems and I like reporting and documenting; and if I were to go back I'd succeed; BECAUSE I KNOW MYSELF BETTER.

  • @koertje I'm able to comprehend complex things; so I CAN know of chemistry and physics; I know more than average as I did it in college, I know of biochemistry and organic chemistry and other chemistries and biology. I did not complete that course because I'm better at mathematics than studying by rote-memory at that time, I'm doing computer science now.

    I'm a better study now because I'm learning a good deal about preparing and maintaining myself sustainably at study, I do so too as a hobby.

  • @osheaad sure, aren't all our egos inflated. That is the nature of the ego.

    I am just annoyd by this kind of folks.Sorry, mayby I should express myself more polite.

    But didn't his real estate business fail? And isn't it clear that he knows not much of chemistry ?

    Sure the conspiracy market is big these days, so there is some profit to make.

    Looking for cyanid in the walls as proof for his setup, OMG what an idiot, sorry.

    Do you know of chemistry and physics ?

  • @koertje IF his ego is inflated and his perspective BLURRED, THEN IT IS GOOD TO TELL HIM, he might agree.

    IF HE IS A CON-MAN, THEN the evidence of that must be shown, and that evidence shared so PEOPLE SEE FOR THEMSELVES, and also THAT PEOPLE MAY KNOW THE STRENGTH OF THAT EVIDENCE and not just believe an accusation in ignorance. FALSE ACCUSATIONS ARE POSSIBLE TOO, because he discusses UNPOPULAR THEMES.

  • @koertje Why do you find it necessary to use AD-HOMINEMS ("The man knows as little x, y z", "The man is deliberately looking for popular idioty to try sell his books", "he is a parasite")?

    ALL THAT MATTERS TO ME IS THE LOGIC (AND UN-BIAS) OF HIS ARGUMENTS.

    I don't like "to shame and to be shamed" culture. A person should be able to give fallacious arguments and be shown the fallacies, their reputation should not change; CURIOSITY IS TO BE ENCOURAGED NOT DISMISSED.

    MAYBE his ego is inflated?

  • @osheaad The man knows as little of physics and chemistry as he knows of the real estate business.

    Hydrogen cyanid is a gas and won't stay years in a brickwall.

    The man is deliberately looking for popular idioty to try sell his books.

    In my view he is a parasite.

  • @koertje I don't know the man, but everyone should be at least heard and not dismissed because of prejudice against unpopular themes. It isn't right that curiosity may be dismissed by irrational phobias. I trust in logic, and I do not see the logic connecting the claim, "An intentional systemic extermination of Jewish people, accounting for the result 6 million dead took place" with the findings or evidence.

    Bandwagon fallacy; "Idea I is popular. Therefore, I is correct."?

    I know I don't know.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more