joe rockocoko vs jonah lomu
Top Comments
All Comments (180)
-
Rokocoko in his prime was good, as were/are all young All Black Wingers but compared to Jonah he was nothing.
Doug Howlett > Rokocoko imo.
GO THE ALL BLACKS!
-
@patascau Absolutely no comparison whatsoever!
-
joe was mint but jonah was the guy u just throw it to with any sort of space and he'l create something or draw in heaps of defenders. unequaled dominance
-
whatever lomu was faster people think because lomu was big he was slower were as he was super quick for his statur and joe is an amazing winger to you have to think to be a winger in the all blacks you had to be amazing init and that guy saying it was his kidneys not his legs is a stupid thing to say
-
such a forward pass 2:10
-
two very different players but equally awesome.
-
Lomu all day
-
The difference between Jonah lomu and Joe rockocoko is that Lomu wont fall for a tackle xD
-
they both got speed and power but the one thing lomu doesn't have that Rokokcoko has is agility, so I guess lomu is still bigger and stronger while Rokockoko's still big and strong but got more skill. I like them both but the ROCKET man is my personal favorite rugby player of all time.
-
@hanros98 fucken that woulda been the sickest backline in history =) id love to see that backline. but swap roko for howlett
@matthewhortop if lomu didn't have his kidney problems and cullen wasn't dropped by mitchell, the backline would have been in 2004
10 spencer
11 lomu
12 mauger/carter
13 umaga
14 rokocoko
15 cullen
WOAH!
hanros98 1 year ago 25
rockocoko no tiene comparacion con jonah lomu
patascau 2 years ago 11