Our Saturday Night Banquet Speaker - Attorney who has represented several lawsuits against President Obama and will explian how the administration hasn't proven his citizenship! Is Obama qualified to be the U.S. President? http://OrlyTaitzESQ.com
Recorded at Freedom Law School's (http://LiveFreeNow.org) Take Back America 2010 Health & Freedom Conference
@altops The Father of the Constitution, simple.
James Madison, The Founders’ Constitution Volume 2, Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2, Document 6 (1789)
“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers, that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state, and in consequence of his obedience, he is entitled to protection… The children of aliens,
cont'd
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@clarity023 Show me You cant. Still whos suppose to rules America? Your Judges? Not the case. 99% wrong were 1% is right is still a minority. Founding Fathers. Your lost in the mind. Get found.
altops 2 weeks ago
@altops Not even one judge agrees with your nonsense not even ONE! So get lost!
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@altops Quote of the day: The government, in its Supreme Court brief, acknowledged that if Wong Kim Ark was a citizen he was eligible to be President. The Supreme Court upheld the District Court ruling without exception.
-- The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions (1999)
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@altops "No he is not" to discover what truth? That all your birther cases have been dumped?
lol! Obama 70+ Birthers 0
Buahahaha
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@clarity023 No he is not, why would hundreds of thousands of dollars be spent by us "birthers" to discover the truth, and conversely why would Obama spend Millions trying to fight it? Why are books written about it? Just saying hes eligible doesn't make it so, and your blind complacency is revolting.
altops 2 weeks ago
@altops GOT IT? Obama is eligible, deal with it.
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@altops cont. "unsatisfactory" and "insufficient to support plaintiffs' allegations."
A number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud were never qualified as experts in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation and "none ... provided persuasive testimony," Malihi wrote.
clarity023 2 weeks ago
@clarity023 OMG the ruling is on the 15th. what are u talking about, you haven't study dung about anything. Your just a shill coolaid drink for Obama for no reason but to endorse the destruction of everything.
altops 2 weeks ago
@clarity023 - You need to do some homework. I have studied this stuff for three years from a legal perspective. It will take you a while to catch up since you are starting so late in the game.
juan563 2 weeks ago