Gravity3Dspacetime

With Lightwave 3D I created a Dynamic Object Gravity Effector
then I created an orbital mesh and give it some cloth properties after a few days of tweaking and a few more days of rendering i came up with this 3D Gravity visualization.
this is something the AlienScientist can use for his dvd.

• Category

  Science & Technology

[tropickman]

WHY don't they ever create this with two revolving bodies, or three, like Sun, Earth, and the Moon.

[AlienScientistFan]

watch the video NOVA | The Fabric of the Cosmos: What Is Space

foward to the min 19:22

[TheCentralServices]

This is wrong on so many levels... Fail!

[STEFAN BADARA]

indeed gravity bends space-time geodetic lines towards the mass objects and do not go aound it like a rock in the river. Very true...

[jimmicreesti]

nice video man, you've done way better than I tried a whil eback with sketchup - not really the program for it. this is more like how I wanted it. Is Lightwave hard to figure out to do this sort of stuff? i'm betting it's taken you a while to get to this stage

[Stephen Anderle]

Why would it need to? That's an unbounded question. Science is the study of. By studying what it studies it proves itself.

[7150285]

I meant if science can prove everything that can science prove what science is? lol

[Stephen Anderle]

On the origin of black holes. ; The light beam from the star or nova that passes through a lot of matter should arrive substantially later. Having passed through a much warped area of space, therefore a longer path than a straight line would have been.! The only way they would arrive at the same time is if the speed of light varies in a gravity field.. Speeding up as it aproaches the mass, and slowing as it recedes from the mass.

[Stephen Anderle]

When the science theory's are proven, then the proofs explain a lot of what is happening and allow us to gain greater understanding. Then we come up with more questions and and more theorems, then use the previous proofs (science) to attempt to prove or disprove them. It's an ongoing process. Not sure what you said at the last. Science proofs show that the study of nature through science methods is valid. And necessary.

[7150285]

so therefore science (which is a human understanding) cannot prove everything. Just like can science prove science itself.