Gary, shape up and man up. Research better and stop jusfiying your beloved sunday school. Group hallucinations do happen. Also, Craig, the notion that the disciples claimed a 'bodily' resurrection is fallacious, you are making the NT a ventrilocuist dummy for your evangelical stuff.
This is all based on the premise that the accounts are true in the first place. Just because the NT says that there was an appearance to a group of disciples, doesn't mean that it was true - that it actually happened. The logic is deficient. The assumption is that the stories are true to begin with, when there is absolutely no way to confirm these stories, which anyhow were written decades after the event by some people who were not even there (e.g. Luke/Paul).
Fourth problem, gary?? fourth?? you haven't stated the first. What burial? what empty tomb?
sirdelrio 4 months ago
And Gary, please spit, swallow saliva, or take that potato out of your mouth. I can't stand the way you talk.
sirdelrio 4 months ago
Gary, shape up and man up. Research better and stop jusfiying your beloved sunday school. Group hallucinations do happen. Also, Craig, the notion that the disciples claimed a 'bodily' resurrection is fallacious, you are making the NT a ventrilocuist dummy for your evangelical stuff.
sirdelrio 4 months ago
@cmk1964 agreed. it's called a confirmational bias. they don't even realize of their mental corruption.
sirdelrio 4 months ago
This is all based on the premise that the accounts are true in the first place. Just because the NT says that there was an appearance to a group of disciples, doesn't mean that it was true - that it actually happened. The logic is deficient. The assumption is that the stories are true to begin with, when there is absolutely no way to confirm these stories, which anyhow were written decades after the event by some people who were not even there (e.g. Luke/Paul).
cmk1964 2 years ago