My question to Richard Dawkins after I heard his responses in two different interviews. I have formed just one question for Mr. Richard Dawkins. "Are YOU hallucinating?
Youtube has disabled embedding of this, so I have uploaded an embeddable version on my website here:
Things like father son relationships are merely general similarities that you would expect to find in any culture or religion, just like almost all religions believe in gods, spirits or an afterlife. It's the differences that are significant. While Hindus and the ancient Greeks worshipped multiple gods, the whole basis of Christianity and Islam is that there is only one true god, so those religions are definitely not just the same god with different names..
i am not religious, i am a man seeking truth, i dont accept a book which has been written by man to create fear in people and accept it to be the word of god. i believed evolution for years but after watching these 3 very imformative videos i no longer can accept the theory of evolution. please watch these : water the great mystery full length on youtube, humans and dinosaurs coexist also on youtube and scientists present proof of intelligent design part 1-7. if you seek truth these will help
@solemiochef I think it's very important for you to fight the matter. Which is ok. Your words are personal attacks, not facts. I will not only debate the facts, I have in fact demonstrated them. The personal attacks that you have offered are not material for a proper or constructive debate.
@xcannabiscom LOL Rhetoric is all you have. All I have pointed out is that understanding that anything is possible and acting on that understanding are two different things. This simple observation demonstrates how silly your original point is. You wrongly assumed that you GOTCHA'd Dawkins, when all you really did was demonstrate your ignorance. Now, instead of just admitting you were wrong... you are trying to obscure the facts. Why not try addressing the argument? The answer? You can't.
@solemiochef Just because Im not going to play into your straw man arguments. I have no intention on debating you about claims that I have not even made. If you have to stoop to that position, offering the ideas of others and presenting them as my own to some how debunk my theory, well it's obvious you have lost ground here and are trying desperately to recover.
I came from atheism/agnosticism to creationism. I've heard it all, and in fact used it all before. You're argument is weak.
@xcannabiscom Obviously arguing is not you point. It only leads to exposing you as a someone who has no idea what they are talking about. I dont care if you believe god can heal you or not. The point is that Believing something and acting on that belief are two different things. I understand that you are not interested in even trying to understand anything that calls into question your belief in superstition. That's why your posts are devoid of thoughtful comments.
@solemiochef Arguing with you is not my point, and it is not productive. I didn't say anything about god healing me. I am talking about intelligent design. No need to set up a straw man argument to prove some point that you want to make. If you want to ask me if I believe god can heal me, then just ask me. But that is not a point I even brought up. Your arguments are no more effective than Dawkins arguments.
Belief is belief. You believe that there is no god. I believe that there is.
@solemiochef Belief that there is no God, is no more provable than there is a God. With exception to the proof in intelligent design. You keep responding in a way that you believe I reject science. I don't. I just don't accept that it is remotely possible that human life came to be by accident. I believe adaptation is real. But that doesn't explain everything. So you have beliefs, and I have beliefs. Who is hallucinating? Both of us? Belief is belief.
@xcannabiscom Understanding that anything is possible and believing something to be true are two very different things. Particularly if you act on your belief. Understanding a god could cure you of appendicitis is one thing... but believing he will and avoiding, and denying tried and true science is idiotic.
If you spent as much time trying to understand Dawkins and Science as you do trying to pole holes in science you might actually learn something. And learning is the end of superstition.
@x234gm Yes I see that one or two of the similarities can be easily writen off as coincidence. However there are too many coincidences IMHO
buttedheads 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Things like father son relationships are merely general similarities that you would expect to find in any culture or religion, just like almost all religions believe in gods, spirits or an afterlife. It's the differences that are significant. While Hindus and the ancient Greeks worshipped multiple gods, the whole basis of Christianity and Islam is that there is only one true god, so those religions are definitely not just the same god with different names..
x234gm 3 months ago
i am not religious, i am a man seeking truth, i dont accept a book which has been written by man to create fear in people and accept it to be the word of god. i believed evolution for years but after watching these 3 very imformative videos i no longer can accept the theory of evolution. please watch these : water the great mystery full length on youtube, humans and dinosaurs coexist also on youtube and scientists present proof of intelligent design part 1-7. if you seek truth these will help
10bhave 7 months ago 2
@solemiochef I think it's very important for you to fight the matter. Which is ok. Your words are personal attacks, not facts. I will not only debate the facts, I have in fact demonstrated them. The personal attacks that you have offered are not material for a proper or constructive debate.
xcannabiscom 7 months ago
@xcannabiscom LOL Rhetoric is all you have. All I have pointed out is that understanding that anything is possible and acting on that understanding are two different things. This simple observation demonstrates how silly your original point is. You wrongly assumed that you GOTCHA'd Dawkins, when all you really did was demonstrate your ignorance. Now, instead of just admitting you were wrong... you are trying to obscure the facts. Why not try addressing the argument? The answer? You can't.
solemiochef 8 months ago
@solemiochef Just because Im not going to play into your straw man arguments. I have no intention on debating you about claims that I have not even made. If you have to stoop to that position, offering the ideas of others and presenting them as my own to some how debunk my theory, well it's obvious you have lost ground here and are trying desperately to recover.
I came from atheism/agnosticism to creationism. I've heard it all, and in fact used it all before. You're argument is weak.
xcannabiscom 8 months ago
@xcannabiscom Obviously arguing is not you point. It only leads to exposing you as a someone who has no idea what they are talking about. I dont care if you believe god can heal you or not. The point is that Believing something and acting on that belief are two different things. I understand that you are not interested in even trying to understand anything that calls into question your belief in superstition. That's why your posts are devoid of thoughtful comments.
solemiochef 8 months ago
@solemiochef Arguing with you is not my point, and it is not productive. I didn't say anything about god healing me. I am talking about intelligent design. No need to set up a straw man argument to prove some point that you want to make. If you want to ask me if I believe god can heal me, then just ask me. But that is not a point I even brought up. Your arguments are no more effective than Dawkins arguments.
Belief is belief. You believe that there is no god. I believe that there is.
xcannabiscom 8 months ago
@solemiochef Belief that there is no God, is no more provable than there is a God. With exception to the proof in intelligent design. You keep responding in a way that you believe I reject science. I don't. I just don't accept that it is remotely possible that human life came to be by accident. I believe adaptation is real. But that doesn't explain everything. So you have beliefs, and I have beliefs. Who is hallucinating? Both of us? Belief is belief.
xcannabiscom 8 months ago
@xcannabiscom Understanding that anything is possible and believing something to be true are two very different things. Particularly if you act on your belief. Understanding a god could cure you of appendicitis is one thing... but believing he will and avoiding, and denying tried and true science is idiotic.
If you spent as much time trying to understand Dawkins and Science as you do trying to pole holes in science you might actually learn something. And learning is the end of superstition.
solemiochef 8 months ago