Lance Armstrong - Road To Paris

Montage of Road To Paris featuring Lance and Team edited by Nick Culvenor

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Lance
• Armstrong
• Road
• To
• Paris
• Cycling
• bikes
• tour
• de
• france
• paris
• roubaix
• erik
• dekker
• culvenor

[iamtherang]

i got so much respect for this man

[7nidy]

this man is legend

[musicNsoccer]

@ZQPYU Stamp an asterisk (a la Barry Bonds) on his forehead! May the EPO be with you! Dope Strong!

[quadgreen]

really like the background music from madonna....it matches this video perfectly....how can i enjoy this nice video completely again??

[ZQPYU]

Connecting dots requires proof to establish a connection to the previous dot. Where's the proof? Where's the connection? Seems you have a problem focusing on reality. What is, is and what does not exist, does not exist. The positive test you haters keep eluding to does not exist, otherwise the man would have been beaten down like all the other cheaters.

Lance brings Hope to those who need it most and he has shown he is worthy of praise. That is all he is guilty of, all there is proof of.

[hghepo]

Because you have problem to connect the dots, explain why Lance would be clean when most of his contenders tested positive or were implicated in T-Mobile or Puerto scandal?

Is EPO scientifically proved to be a very effective enhancement drug?

Is blood doping the field of Dr. Ferrari?

Is lance connected with Ferrari?

Did Lance improved drastically after working with Ferrari?

Were that impprovement questionned by all after his win at DL in 99?

Is Lance improvement similar to EPO improvement?

[ZQPYU]

@hghepo

Changing the subject because you have run-out of substance I see. Your hindsight is as murky as your foresight. Better stick to one topic to make it easier for you.

[hghepo]

Power on climb or VAM are easy to calculate, you just need time and height, the weight of rider is not important for comparaison during time, road friction are very often similar on major cols like Alpe d'Huez, Hautacam, Tourmalet,..

So datas exist.

Maybe should I provide you irrefutable proves like Bush did to invade Irak. You have better to use your brain before referring to idiocracy.

[ZQPYU]

@hghepo

30% based on assumptions and a completely uncontrolled comparison environment. If you want to be scientific about it, get the data that doesn't exist. Oh, you all did, you call it proof and the rest of the world calls it tabloid fodder. You and all the pro-Armstrong-doper legion can't seem to get that.

No irrefutable evidence means nothing, that which you all have.

[hghepo]

Just have a look to the charts of my youtube page to see that Lance was 30% more powerfull with EPO help.

In 1995, he head an equivalent of 360-380cyclismag W, and in 1999 he reached more than 450 on some cols.

[hghepo]

Look at Lance's performance : Tour de France 1993 1rst moutain stage 86 Armstrong +21'42 2nd moutain 97 LA +28'47 then DNS TDF 1994 1rst mountain stage 64. Armstrong à 7'03 2nd mountain 55. LA à 20'09 then DNS TDF 1995 mountain stage: 40. Armstrong +17'57 mountain : 56. LA +18'44 mountain : 117. LA +28'05 mountain : 64. LA +32'54

[ZQPYU]

@hghepo

"and performances increased by 30% in 3 years" more of that LeMond fallacy. Funny, he had some incredible days on the bike with no doping; his "training/preparation" failed him as it does those who dope and those who do not, like Lance.

LMAO