North Tower Demolition Adjusted For Sound Delay Proves Explosions Occurred Before "Collapse"

NIST FOIA North Tower Demolition Adjusted For Sound Delay Proves Explosions Occurred Before "Collapse"

The camera that shot this 9/11 footage was located 6000 feet (or 1.136 miles) from the World Trade Center. Sound travels in air at about 1120 feet per second. One mile = 5280 feet.

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound

It took approximately 5.4 seconds for the explosions to reach the camera. The explosions heard on the video actually occurred before the North Tower started to fall. Proving that the sound of explosions weren't caused by floors falling on top of one another.

Location of camera near "40 North River Piers New York, NY 10014" on "Hudson River Greenway".

Google Map:
http://maps.google.com/maps?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:offici...

Street view on above map shows that the location of the camera was near this location when the video was originally recorded on September 11, 2001, which can be compared to the original video below (forward 2 minutes and compare with street view on map):

9/11 North Tower Demolition - Northwest Corner (New FOIA #20 FBI_2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3bTXYm766E

Thanks to Youtuber "IranContraScumDid911" for uploading the original NIST FOIA video.

For more info on how this footage was obtained through FOIA, see link below:

International Center for 9/11 Studies Secures Release of Thousands of Photos and Videos from NIST
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-08-31/international-center-911-studies-secure...

Music excerpts from Don Henley's song "Inside Job"

Fair Use Statement
This video may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making this material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material contained in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Category:

Education

Tags:

• north
• tower
• demo
• sound
• delay
• 9/11
• World
• Trade
• Center
• WTC
• FOIA
• NIST
• Inside
• Job
• ae911truth
• Bush
• Obama
• Iraq
• Afghanistan

[footballphenom34]

I honestly thought the sounds were very "boomish" and heard the 5,4,3,2,1, and then I heard about 100 more of the same sounds getting faster and faster... I did find the video interesting but I think you proved yourself wrong because someone with ears could heard the same sounds following eachother after your countdown. My conclusion- levels, wieghting tons upon tons, falling at increasing speeds. not bombs that dont go off when planes and jet fuel hit them.. thanks for the video though.

[StevenM818]

@footballphenom34

Your comment makes no sense, but thanks for the input.

[StevenM818]

@Steelerguy6178

The audible signatures from the helicopter and the "Booms" are not the same. The "Boom" sound only occurs when the tower fell (the video is much longer than the excerpt presented here, and there were no "Booms" b4 it fell). There are also other videos that corroborate the "Boom" sound (without helicopters overhead). The "Booms" have always been explained as floors falling on each other. But once the sound delay is adjusted, it's clear the "Booms" occurred before the tower fell.

[FlashMeterRed]

how red would those terrorist's faces be if they knew the bush admin were already going to destroy the towers with explosives? and ON THE SAME DAY! talk about looking silly...

[DarkwingScooter]

@pjnlsn c) The angle cuts on the columns. I am actually on my third reconsideration of this famous image - the major problem is that the alternative hypothesis (thermic lances during cleanup) does not appear to make this kind of straight edge cut and I have not seen angled cuts made by them.

d) The general state of dissociation of the debris suggestion more energy than gravity alone could provide.

4) Sociological issues: The behavior of the Bush admin and security apparatus before and after.

[DarkwingScooter]

@pjnlsn f) The apparent similarity of the collapses despite differences in tower design (specifically the hat truss), damage type and collapse onset mode.

3) Positive proof (these are highly disputed for obvious reasons):

a) The thermite study has been attacked largely on ad hominem grounds. There have been replications of all the key claims and no published refutation.

b) The type of damage seen on the columns. Some of these damage types are very unlikely to have been caused by gravity.

[DarkwingScooter]

@pjnlsn 2) Some features of the collapse are most likely not explicable by gravitation alone.

These include:

a) The highly localized ejections.

b) The completeness of the collapse (no tower stub remains).

c) The rapidity of the collapse (debatable for the twins but not so much for WTC7)

d) The sound evidence presented here (which does not match any gravitation only descriptions known to me)

e) The apparent symmetry of the collapses despite a highly asymmetrical onset in at least one tower.

[DarkwingScooter]

@pjnlsn The second problem related to the first issue is that all gravitational theories rely on some form of solid rigid upper body to perform the crushing work:

a) Bazant's solid block crush-up crush down.

b) A flat pancake type floor collapse to produce the 'air pressure' ejections.

c) A wedge shape mass of material to produce the bowing of the exterior columns while simultaneously continue the progression.

None of these have any basis in empirically demonstrated physical reality.

[DarkwingScooter]

@pjnlsn "But feel free to contradict that belief."

Okay, I'll indulge. Bear in mind space is short.

The major issues that non-explosive explanations for the collapse face are:

1) No precedents for the proposed mode of gravitational collapse, they all exist in the minds of the theorists.

The biggest single problem in this regard is the supposed 'thermal expansion' theories' for sudden global collapse onset as required. These have never been demonstrated to occur in sufficient magnitudes.

[StevenM818]

@pjnlsn

"I believe they all fell from fire and structural damage"

Sorry but I refuse to waste any more of my time on you. Your page says you're only 20 years old, & it's quite obvious, from reading your comments, that the stage of your research still lies in infancy. Perhaps after you've spent as much time as I or others (such as ae911truth w/ 1400 architects and engineers) who've studied and shredded this case to bits for several years, you will reverse your inaccurate conclusion. Good luck!