Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the "Pull it" comment

Analyzing what Silverstein could have meant when he said "pull it." The two theories, the "pull the building" theory and the "pull the firefighters" theory, both seem to have holes in them. What did his comment really mean?

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Larry
• Silverstein
• WTC
• pull
• it
• controlled
• demolition
• fire
• firefighters
• 9/11
• 9-11
• 911
• Twin
• Towers
• World
• Trade
• Center

[shanahan06]

Larry is a Jewish American in a position of power. Why should anyone trust him?

[dubified89]

"We're never know until we have a new investigation" which means we'll never know cause there's never going to be this fabled new investigation unless you mean one outside of government which will have no serious ramifications for anyone 'convicted'.

[13falls123]

"Pull" means demolish, but not with explosives. it's never used to refer to bringing down building with explosives.

[Dawgtha]

from: thefreedictionaryDOTcom/pull+d­­own pull down:

1. To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building.

from: diclib.com Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary 4th edition: To pull down a building or statue means to deliberately destroy it.

from: websters-online-dictionaryDOTo­­rg pull: 4: [Verb] To demolish; to subvert; to destroy. In political affairs, as well as mechanical. from princetonDOTedu# tear down so as to make flat with the ground.

[cityhawk80]

Again, the presence of CIA and DOD offices is reason why they could leave WTC 7 standing, and cordon it off while removing evidence under the guise that they're removing classified material. The only reason the other WTC buildings didn't collapse themselves is because they were pulverized by 2 of the biggest buildings on Earth.

[illyounotme]

What does it matter? If it was destroyed it is no longer evidence, it is nonexistent. Your question was what was gained. Destruction of evidence of the crime committed is of course the most obvious motive. That not just one but multiple government agencies were housed in WTC 7. CIA, IRS, Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission, Department of Defense, Immigration & Naturalization Service, and the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management. Makes it hard to even pinpoint where to speculate.

[cityhawk80]

What kind of evidence do you speculate they were destroying?

[illyounotme]

You asked what was to be gained? I posed a gain. The risk of being caught trying to move evidence out of the building may have been too great, the amount of material to much. Your risk-benefit is based off very little information, and a lot of assumption on your part. You seem to have problems believing in conspiracy theories.

But Do Not Forget, the official story is a conspiracy theory!

You seem to want to find holes in speculation, that doesn't stop the evidence of controlled demolition.

[cityhawk80]

You're right about the lack of evidence. Now, with all the commotion of 2 buildings collapsing, it's would've been easy for the feds to move any "evidence" of "conspiracy" (obviously highly speculative) while sealing the building off to rescue workers under the guise of its instability. The risk-benefit ratio alone makes the WTC 7 theories near-impossible