Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nanjing MG Rover 25 Crash test

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
96,746
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 3, 2007

http://www.chinacarforums.com - euroncap chinese car mg rover creash test

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You're a complete twerp. I be you never owned one since you believe everything you read in the press!

    TW@T !!

  • Rover 25's are good cars, just because the press give them bad reviews about headroom and back seat room, dosen't mean there bad, I like my Rover 25, and in fact I remeber a Daewoo we where unfortunate enouth to own several years back and that had even less space in the back than my Rover

see all

All Comments (120)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I've got 2 216 gti's a tomcat coupe,an sd1 an austin metro and a rover 114, I collect them as they're soon gonna be a thing of the past. I've never had any problems with them don't forget they had a Honda collaboration before BMW buggered it all up and they made good carsAustinrovercollection.co.u­k

  • @untensil I had a 216 and I loved it until the automatic gearbox died and no mechanic in this country dares to repair it (it's toooo complicated they say). So I sold it and bought a Mazda and haven't looked back.

    Still miss the old 216 though.

  • I know ppl hate rovers. but i like my rover 75, nice and comfy!

  • OMG

  • @jason123456789210 yeah, sadly..

  • @derwilli87 but now they're under chinee ownership

  • @derwilli87 Only the look of the car was designed in 1994. The 75 and ZT had BMW suspension, K-Bus electrics, brakes, had one of their engines, BMW robots were used to build it. Its a long list. The 75 is as much BMW as the new Mini. Both the 75 and the mini were designed by Rover using BMW technical assistance and access to the parts bin.

  • As a mechanic with 17 years MG Rover experience I can assure you that Head gasket failure of K-series engine was a major problem affecting alot of cars. Porous heads, oil gallery in wrong place, poor quality control...these were poor cars, hence MG Rovers demise. If any ex-rover franchise mechanic with long experince of these cars doubts my claim, they are lying and they know it. Build and design quality was poor for the money asked.

  • I've owned Austin, MG and Rover's all my life and never had a problem with them, which is why I kept buying them. My current car is a 2005 MG ZS 2.0 and touch wood, I've not had to replace a thing yet - it has passed each MOT - though I do keep it regularly serviced. The only thing I can find that I might have to replace for the next MOT is one of the front tyres - AFTER 6 YFEARS AND 37,00 MILES!!

    It's brilliant, but then again it's an MG Rover. It's why I'm getting a new MG6 this Spring...

  • That's fair enough, but by whom? You?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more