In the 2007 Rutherford College Staff vs Student Debate, the first speaker of the Staff Affirmative Team opens her team's case in support of the moot 'That we should not trust anyone under 30'.
Not very good speaking skills, showing weakness by denying chens points of information. not enough justification for your senile claims and too much talk about boring and irrelivent stuff. Comedic elements are too subtle for you to pull off. so over all, pretty bad.
repeatedly denied POI's...not good for a staff like her...
jpfabros 1 year ago
what debating style is this?
Glotion 2 years ago
Not very good speaking skills, showing weakness by denying chens points of information. not enough justification for your senile claims and too much talk about boring and irrelivent stuff. Comedic elements are too subtle for you to pull off. so over all, pretty bad.
But you are a good drama teacher. all the best
Sam
AOTEAROAsam 3 years ago