Debunking Creationist Geology (Part 2A)
Uploader Comments (Geochron)
Top Comments
-
Rocks: More intelligent than creationists.
-
Thanks for addressing what can laugably be called "Creationist math."
All Comments (27)
-
@thornisdan Yep. Most electronic components are based on just that principle.
-
Your Math is about Chance, evolution is not by chance. A Rocks atoms do not need to be in a correct order to be a rock.
-
@RHYMEMAIDEN1 2+2=Jesus?
-
Awesome, can't wait.
If you take requests on part 3, I'd like to see more evidence against the flood.
-
ba ha ha.... this is exactly the sort of argument i like to use.
it seems pretty impressive to work out probabilities that things could have happened just how they did, and then say, "see? that means God must have purposely done it that way, because it couldn't have happened by chance."
but *everything* that happens is extraordinarily unlikely. and yet *something* always happens. amazing.
-
Everyone of us alive has won at least one lottery :P
-
Like claiming the lottery was fixed because the arrangement of numbers was so improbable.
-
ohhhhh math
nope
sorry you just lost me
So where's the part 2B?
clerlic 2 years ago
2B is about a week away.
Geochron 2 years ago
Mineral formulas aren't fixed. For example Iron can substitute for Magnesium, or Calcium, ect, depending on the mineral. You would have to take that into account, as well as the atomic structure can have imperfections.
thornisdan 2 years ago
That's in part 2. Trust me on this.
Geochron 2 years ago
Im going to guess what youre going to say: that ANY arrangement is unique and not special. So any arrangement would be equally plausible.
4jonah 2 years ago
Part 2B (almost finished) covers exclusivity and mineral formation. I was going to include it with this video, but unfortunately I have a 10 minute limit and the 2nd part really can't be broken up.
Geochron 2 years ago