Sampras rallying Agassi, US Open 2002

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
27,097
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 12, 2008

Sampras rallying Agassi, US Open 2002

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (223)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • saying, that Pete was/is ugly is a stupid comment. He may have had a sluggish walk, but as soon as the ball is in play, he moved like a panther. 

  • when i see this video, i wonder if it plays quickly now, i'm not sure. some point have an amazing speed even much faster than now. they now have slow the surfaces... sure that at their best, Sampras could win against Nadal, Federer or Djokovic etc.

  • @Thutmosis7

    Yah they strike alike. I think Agassi was probably the funnest player to watch because of the control he had striking

  • @splendid1000 Interesting. Good point. People compare djoko to agassi somewhat.

  • Hmmmm...Agassi's shot at 1:07 looks out...

  • @Thutmosis7

    Nadal is a better mover and grinder and thats why he wins. Movement is SO important in tennis obviously, but Agassi's groundstrokes are better.

  • @mikatagahara1212

    Yeah... Winners usually make your opponent feel pretty awkward...

  • this video is a tribute to Sampras' all-court ability...Rafter and Tim Henman were true serve & volley players, but both of them combined could not pull off half the shots that Pete made in this match.

    imo, the current generation of tennis players play a boring brand of tennis - its all baseline and lacking variety....i miss the daring nature and the quick reflexes of serve and volley tennis

    and for the record: Pete > Roger (nostalgic biased tennis fan of the 90s)

  • @mikatagahara1212 id give anything to hit a forehand like he did....even turn my good looking one into this akward one of his

  • @mikatagahara1212 ugliness is relative to the eye of the beholder. besides, it's not that bad unlike some other pros we could mention.

    just watch what he did with the ball especially on the running forehand than the aesthetics of his stroke.

    they grew up in the time of wooden rackets and the early players rackets

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more