WINDSOR DESPUÉS DEL INCENDIO
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
All Comments (13)
-
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
What did the USA give the government of Pakistan concerning Bin Laden and 911 in early October of 2001?
How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?
-
Windsor VS WTC1/2
Core: Concrete/Steel
Fire spread: Near 100%/Less than 1%
Fire duration: 18 hours/1-2 hours
Fire-proofing: None/Light
Collapse nature: Gradual and partial throughout hours/Sudden and complete in under 15 seconds
Collapse result: 30% damage to outer steel frame, no damage to core/Core and frame completely leveled
Unfortunately, the crucial differences in buildings' construction do not allow for adequate comparison of the collapses.
-
Doesn't change the fact that it wasn't used in the WTC.
-
No, it wasn't. Construction began on the WTC before rebar really caught on, and it was entirely steel with a light spray-on brittle mercury oxide fireproofing, which was dislodged in the crash.
-
The core of the WT tower was exactly that -steel beams embedded in concrete -where did you think all the concrete dust came from?You can see the shuttering and reinforcement in the construction pics.I don't get what you people are trying to achieve by misrepresenting 'in your face' facts all the time.
Reinforced concrete doesn't lose its strength because it is embedded with STEEL bars.Doh.
-
except maybe you didn't notice that the top half of the steel supported building collapsed down onto itself. The only part still standing was the concrete core. Concrete is much more resistant to fire than steel, doesn't lose its strength.
-
grow up you immature tit.Semantics semantics semantics -yawn.
-
It was a concrete building with a concrete core that reinforced "with" steel, the steel called rebar is embedded in the concrete so it was not exposed to the heat. STFU u idiot.
-
And steel naturally.
3:53New windsor fire dept. videoby flyboy6152,989 views
Featured Video- 6:28Windsorby pajaroenmano9,316 views
- 1:20Building Collapseby fmjava1,172,578 views
- 2:28La Campos habla sobre el misterio del Windsorby dlvcplm5,769 views
- 5:4111-M Cuando la calle habló - COMIENZOby elegantmobfilms150,857 views
- 0:34Windsorby suenaasi2,788 views
- 1:36Quiénes fueron los del windsorby dlvcplm24,766 views
- 0:57Windsor Building Fire BBC Reportby MoteparaMotim35,376 views
- 3:12El misterio del incendio del edificio Windsorby cuatro28,311 views
- 1:20Kill Dozer Part IIby hance1976176,365 views
- 0:27Windsorby suenaasi610 views
- 0:22Incendio Torre Phelps-Caracas 15-07-08by spaldenkreutz3,352 views
- 3:589/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Ex...by RKOwens4290,687 views
- 0:09wtc 7 collapseby sebass0071,023,856 views
- 0:40Windsor on fireby scheer10,520 views
- 0:23Windsor on fire IIby scheer5,733 views
- 3:12Windsor Castle - After the Fireby DukeMediaGroup4,714 views
- 2:10The Windsor Tower in Madrid Spainby Stanley356410,894 views
- 1:234409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into r...by RP440913,170,362 views
- 0:33La verdad del Windsorby dlvcplm27,631 views
yep. still standing.just like you would expect any steel framed building to.
stratocaster539 3 years ago 11
You can argue about it till the cows come home. 'rebar' as you call it has been in use since the 1950's it's the only thing that holds most of our crappily built concrete buildings together. It's frequently the main reason explosive demolition has to be used. Sometimes earthquakes will collapse a badly designed building but it will still come down in big reinforced chunks.
stratocaster539 2 years ago 3