The SUV is back! With crossovers trying to convince drivers that cars can be SUVs and with SUVs hiding out pretending to be minivans, the Durango commits to being a true SUV.
@HifeMan haha yes I completly agree with you, man. But i was just saying, besides the price difference, the guy in the ad is saying that," Maybe the only SUV that S stands for Sport.." Although the cars I mentioned may have price differences, they are SPORTY SUV's and they definitely dont forget the "S" in Sport. BTW,a Base Dodge Durango Citadel model with AWD is about $42,000.You could add lets say 8 more thousand dollars and buy the basic Porsche Cayenne,and thats pretty darn quick. Your right
@singhG7 Look at the price of the Durango then look at the price for a ML63 AMG.... Next time i see an Aston martin vanquish S ill say "Alright its nice. but it not that *Performancy*. Look at the Koenigsegg CCR or the B Engineering Edonis, how bout the Pagani Zonda S 7.3"..... You know you could always upgrade right?
Alright its nice. But its not that "Performancy". Look at the BMW X5M or the X6M, how bout the ML63 AMG. How bout the Range Rover Sport? How bout the Porsche Cayenne Turbo? How bout the G55 AMG? How bout the Jeep srt8? id rather have any of those then this durango. geez
okay so for the people who think that this is a repeated commerical, well it is, The whole commerical is repeated and the only difference you will notice is the year of the car. At the end it will say 2012 compared to the other one it will say 2011. Why in the world would dodge upload repeated commercials. They also did the same for 8 other dodge commericals. ? The 2012 durango is a really good vehicle but that was just a sad move they did.
@HifeMan haha yes I completly agree with you, man. But i was just saying, besides the price difference, the guy in the ad is saying that," Maybe the only SUV that S stands for Sport.." Although the cars I mentioned may have price differences, they are SPORTY SUV's and they definitely dont forget the "S" in Sport. BTW,a Base Dodge Durango Citadel model with AWD is about $42,000.You could add lets say 8 more thousand dollars and buy the basic Porsche Cayenne,and thats pretty darn quick. Your right
singhG7 3 weeks ago
@singhG7 Look at the price of the Durango then look at the price for a ML63 AMG.... Next time i see an Aston martin vanquish S ill say "Alright its nice. but it not that *Performancy*. Look at the Koenigsegg CCR or the B Engineering Edonis, how bout the Pagani Zonda S 7.3"..... You know you could always upgrade right?
HifeMan 3 weeks ago
Alright its nice. But its not that "Performancy". Look at the BMW X5M or the X6M, how bout the ML63 AMG. How bout the Range Rover Sport? How bout the Porsche Cayenne Turbo? How bout the G55 AMG? How bout the Jeep srt8? id rather have any of those then this durango. geez
singhG7 3 weeks ago
I like it. Durango kicks ass.
brapboys503 3 weeks ago
The Durango doesn't really commit to being a true SUV though because it's a unibody.
pillowsnake94 1 month ago
When I first saw the beginning of this ad I thought it would be a Challenger/Charger commercial
49brewcrew 1 month ago
okay so for the people who think that this is a repeated commerical, well it is, The whole commerical is repeated and the only difference you will notice is the year of the car. At the end it will say 2012 compared to the other one it will say 2011. Why in the world would dodge upload repeated commercials. They also did the same for 8 other dodge commericals. ? The 2012 durango is a really good vehicle but that was just a sad move they did.
MHaQuE32 1 month ago
@pedrooavz not need for an apology brother, was just letting you know it was old :)
metalmaniac159 1 month ago
is that a real abandon race track with old stock cars laying around, or was it made to look old and rustic for the commertial?
brandon6pk 1 month ago
@metalmaniac159 Sorry, I'm brazilian and here we don't have commercials of any nice car. Every good commercial I see is through youtube.
pedrooavz 1 month ago