9-11 Eyewitness Hoboken excerpt - WTC-1

An 8:46 clip from the new version of 9-11 Eyewitness analyzes the WTC-1 collapse, showing debris ejected upward and demolition squibs. The "spire" appears at ~3:40 and is gone by 3:55.
http://www.911eyewitness.com/

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• 911
• wtc
• demolition
• eyewitness
• wtc1
• north
• tower

[maureenOWW]

Wouldn't it be great if a world-renowned demolition expert, architect or engineer agreed with this conspiracy nonsense? I mean JUST ONE. Ah, but then again THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, which is why not one qualified person has come forward saying that it's obviously a demolition. NOT ONE. How surprising! Even the people who BUILT THE BUILDING say that what happened is exactly what they would expect after such a set of events.

[plaguepuppy]

Check out Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth web site (Google "AE911truth"), currently up to 130 members. As is so often the case with these claims by debunkers, it's based on a refusal to even bother looking at the evidence.

patriotsquestion911 also has a list of over 170 engineers and architects, many of them quite prominent.

[happyquails]

niced try, but you went to a lot of trouble without seeing the flaws in your own reasoning

[plaguepuppy]

Which are...?

[mostmost1]

i find it harder to believe that 19 unsofisticated poorly trained assassins with box cutters could bring down these towers.

i just cant buy that.

[Evi1Jester]

Great video. Huge thanks for the upload. Maybe someday, truth will prevail.

[shadowwbn]

@mjimih Prior to 911 Building 7 was rigged for implossion, this is FACT. So if this is true then is it possible for the towers to be rigged. When you add the pancaking, the eye/ear witness accounts, the video feed details, simple physics, along with the secrecy of the investigation and IMMEDIATE confiscation and destruction of the evidence then to me they were rigged to implode. Plus the twin tower owner took out a insurance policy to cover something like this months before 9-11. I have no doubt

[shadowwbn]

@mjimih That makes sense. Unfortunately I was drunk when I put that post up and didnt finish it. The reason why I said it really doesnt matter is this. Building 7 was brought down by implossion, the owner of the building stated on the news that he gave the firemen chief permission to do it and it went down hours later. But you can NOT setup a building like that, to implode perfectly like that without WEEKS of planning and work. So Building 7 was Rigged for Implossion before (continued)

[mjimih]

@vjmhollywood "I waisted 8:46 of my life.."

.

go waste some more ok thanks. Us truthers want to find the truth bc this tower thing, specially wtc 7, doesn't fucking add up. OK? Americans are smart and we will get to the bottom of this. We won't give up any sooner than A MURDER INVESTIGATOR would!!!!

[mjimih]

@shadowwbn "...possible that it wasn't. at 6:59 you can see part of the wall is still up, then it falls,"

.

the wall was unique. It was interlocked with the one above n below it. It helped hold up the floors. The skin did not have Thermite charges placed on them, so it's quite plausible that parts of it could stay intact while the main part were coming down. Also they were connected to the core by relatively thin trusses, which were ripped FROM the skin, breaking away from the skin.

[mjimih]

@mostmost1 "i find it harder to believe that 19 unsophisticated poorly trained assassins with box cutters could bring down these towers. i just cant buy that."

.

you don't have to. the mercenaries who were inside the building weeks before, planted charges in the towers so they could blow them after they were hit with the planes. The Bush Crime Syndicate must have known the towers were designed to take a jet impact. So they prepared for it.

[shadowwbn]

this is ironic, I was actually a believer,in the whole controlled demolition, but unfortunately you actually showed me that it is possible that it wasnt. at 6:59 you can see part of the wall is still up, then it falls, if you take into account the height from that point in relation to the actual height of the tower, that would explain the debris landing so far away, only the dust cloud covered it up.

Honestly, it really doesnt matter, because

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

This was without a doubt a controlled demolition job.

[TheSiCkSiDeRiDeR]

911 is just a reason for doing war

fuck bush

[zvezdag]

12579

[thedman113]

Dude circles some random falling dust and calls it "vaporized steel". Stupid.