Top 6 Bombers In The World
Uploader Comments (TheMickyGMan1)
Top Comments
-
Damn. Was the guy who made that list a freaking russian?!
All Comments (507)
-
@Wickedsicked8 It's rcs is much worse then the b2 and it payload lower then the b1b. overall she dated too as any interceptor can out run the tu160 these days. So heavy bomber are kinda dated in today's tech. This most likely why the pak fa will be in the medium range. But as heavy bombers go yes the tu160 is the best at only around 300 million a pop.
-
@starknight97 tu160 can although theres even less of those
-
@starknight97 tu160 is superior every way
-
@MikeProductions1000 in a ww3 all side die still for a few years. though bombers are just big easy too hit targets. the B2 is the only 1 that can avoid anything and their not many of them.
-
@MikeProductions1000 Amazing stealth is not so amazing vs L band radar any more. making the B2 big slow small load heavy bomber. a S400 more so a S500 stealth hunting SAM make sort work of the B2. True it's still take longer to detect a B2 they still have too avoid 100+km range of a s400 SAM system. not even saying the pak fa t50's. Even the f22 much better RCS then the B2 can't bet the s400/500 SAMs.
-
It's really funny to people say America is sucking but if there were to another major and I mean major war like world war 3 America would start kicking ass they massed bombers and everything once they'll do it again
-
@starknight97 yeah and b2 is amazing sealth nuclear bomber what better? and if America made A sealth bomber like the b2 now it would kick ass
-
@mrmarcoproduction its abput bomber u douche
-
@TheMickyGMan1 comparing b-2's stealth w/ tu-160 is stupid. tu-160's just got some small RCS modification just like b-1b but b-2's stealth's difference is like heaven and earth
hows the tu160 better then the b1b or the b2. b2 should be #1 for it's stealth.
starknight97 1 week ago
@starknight97 tu-160 has stealth too ! its not first beacouse tu-160 has bigger payload, its faster ! and much more!
TheMickyGMan1 1 week ago 9