Sampras Vs. Kuerten Miami final 2000

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
39,294
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 17, 2006

ATP masters series 2000. Miami final. Pete Sampras Vs. Gustavo Kuerten. 7th match point.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Im merely saying that Sampras on his day, was on another level than Federer, once again my opinion correct? I know Roger might break Petes grand slam record, and I will accept he is a great player, but in my opinion Pete in his heyday and zenith, was just on a completely different level of godly status

  • Roubado descaradamente na terra de Sampras! Sampras hj deve ter vergonha dessa vitória!!!

see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nossa esse jogo foi vergonhoso, meteram a mão no guga !!!!

  • Federer is the best because is the most complete player in tour.

    second. 16 grands slams 16 master series.

    and federer doesnt depend of the style of serve and voley.

    Federer is complete.

    thats why a younger federer beat sampras in grass in 2001

  • haha yup 97 indoor season his special edition black and red nike osciallate shoes. My background pic on my profile is exactly what you are talking about!

  • Agreed. At his peak, with his A game, Pete was unbreakable, unplayable, unbeatable. He was a lean mean killing machine at his height (basically when he wore those NIke shoes with the red tips).

  • LOLLERCAUST @ this incorrect prediction. Federer > Sampras.

  • what happened?

  • Alright firstly I am entitled to my opinion like you said, so there is no need to try and attack my opinions. Federer will not win Roland Garros, and although he has reached it 3 times, you cannot deny the competition he had en route to the final was a joke, once he met a suitable competitor, looked what happened, he won 3 games in the entire match vs Nadal this year? You cant say pete was a second rated player on clay, when he too won prestigious clay tournaments

  • if you think pete was the best that´s your opinion and your entitled to it,just don´t insult roger, because pete NEVER made the french open final,roger did 3 times!! roger has won masters series on clay various times!! pete was second rate on clay,roger is at 13 slams and you say he is nothing compared to sampras? what planet do you live on?? roger is most likely going to pass pete in number of slams..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more