Re: 7 Questions That'll Make Atheists Think!

A reply to manuppowerup's video 7 Questions That'll Make Atheists Think!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Big
• bang
• science
• scientific
• method
• evidence
• evolution
• atheism

[fredbloggs02]

A society where people falsify absolute knowledge with a probability and act into the dark, every instant, as you say "what other choice do we have?" This, Where the collective takes precedence over the individual. An individual can be wrong, a collective can be wrong, but a collective falsified by a collective into the endless reprieve of conviction is necessary. A human soul both guilty and judicious require it and the answer, an infinite reprieve of judgement, as is natural.

[rocketmagnet]

@fredbloggs02 Oh dear. Did you learn to write like that at art school? Or did you use one of those random bullshit generators?

[lolfeg]

you look like prince william

[rocketmagnet]

@lolfeg You can't prove that I'm not.

[rocketmagnet]

@skeleton481 I didn't answer his questions because he didn't bother doing the most basic of research.

[scotttebben]

Thanks to science the gaps god can hide in are getting fewer and smaller all the time. In the future god will be left to reside in mythology and it's believers will become irrelevant and simply an amusing remnant of ignorance.

[Immakinglovetomusic]

"Go and have a look at the evidence yourself, it's easy to find, I'm sure you'll be convinced".

Absolutely Brilliant! though not true, these people have been blinded from birth.

[moldybakedbeans]

Love this response.

[scotttebben]

@biggypimp

Science unlike religion has no agenda. It finds only truth. Science isn't emotionally attached to the will of idiots. There is no faith in trusting the laws of science. It's a matter of experience and it's called an inference, not faith. Inference is nothing like following the mythologies of faith based documents and ancient pantheons. The tenets of religion are solely based on faith as there is no empirical data to support them.

[fredbloggs02]

@mynottwst Depends what you mean by delusional. You diddn't really see it but you saw it, it only existed to you, or it diddn't because it wasn't falsified by a collective? If one day you fell asleep and people shared your dream, and when you awoke, you found yourself alone; which is the dream, which is the truth? How would you tell the difference? As specific as our experiences are, so only I speak for their consummation.

[mynottwst]

@fredbloggs02 i saw a 5 legged dwarf in my dream last night. Was i delusional or have i seen god?

[fredbloggs02]

@rocketmagnet I read Nietzsche, Voltaire and other philosophers who were dead and had less stake in today's society to coerce me to their way of thinking is how I'd account for your initial accusation. As to the second, I can say with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY it has everything to do with my being superior to you from birth lol.

[fredbloggs02]

In a sense the police still do operate under an assumption, and crime certainly implies more than an endless reprieve. You believe in "infallible proof" and so justice likewise. If seeing is believing shouldn't we allow for people who see flashes of God in the same way you see the earth in a picture? No, alone, the way you see your earth is of no consequence to the scientific method, your eyes are of no consequence alone. It selects aspects from the picture, as do the arts.

[fredbloggs02]

Of course Science is a worldview. It couldn't escape being that once examined. It is the endless reprieve. There is a method, a system in the same sense one differentiates acting from action. There is no way that truly encapsulates action, no action can ever be arrived at twice, observed by the man standing at the edge of time, when it could well be as nothing. In that sense, science is a form of art too, acting in observance under an inextricable first principle of "intend towards an end."