Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

3-Way Debate (Full Debate) Part 14

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
866 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 27, 2008

Part 14/14

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Saxking2005)

  • f the only alternative is creation, then That makes evolution very true indeed, seeing as all Hovind's points are false. I don't think he said one thing where my brain didn't cringe at how bad his logic was

  • Yeah, that makes sense. If the only alternative is something you don't want, it must be true.

  • Kent Hovind has produced too many falacious statements in this debate that it is hard to even taken him seriously any more.

    He makes the claim that there is no evidence for biological evolution and abiogenesis because he knows that it is impossible for a evolutionary biologist to explain in 15minutes these two subjects.

  • I've listened for hours and haven't found anyone give a good theory.

  • Then you've been brainwashed.

  • That's what you say instead of GIVING an actual theory?

Top Comments

  • This entire debate is wonderful.  Can the person who posted it re-post it in one long segment?

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Go look at molecular genealogy. You don't even need the fossil record for enough evidence to be convinced of evolution. Look at the geographic distribution of species. Look at the distribution of fossils in the sediment. It's quite obvious unless one is exceptionally deluded, like Hovind.

  • Don't you see the logic of it? The hind legs are small BECAUSE they don't need to walk no more - they swim.

    So yeah, they don't walk. But their ancestors USED to walk.

    And Hovind gave a bunch of fake rebutals, that any proper student of the respective field could see the flaws obviously.

  • they most certainly did!!! It was a commercial/market driven evolution, but they are still 'evolving'!

  • i certainly must have heard more than you, at the least, understood more. I don't know how you got from this debate to 'god is real, the bible is true'.... i assume you already believed that. regardless, kent hovind said a whole lot of nothing in all this!

  • Please explain how evolution could possibly be linked to Cell-phones dvrjosh.

    Cell-phones obviously DID NOT evolve.

  • Name a '' rebutal '' that Shermer gave.

    I obviously missed it.

    Hovind gave a heap of 'rebutals' to evolution.

    Whale's so called "hind legs" is one.

  • What a nasty piece of work you are resistanceunion.

    Shame on you.

  • Yes I was, were you ?

  • ... were you listening at all?!

  • Kent Hovind the only thing he can win now is a FIST in the EYE in JAIL he is in :D . The only thing bigger wean he gets out will be his anus.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more