3-Way Debate (Full Debate) Part 14
Uploader Comments (Saxking2005)
Top Comments
-
This entire debate is wonderful. Can the person who posted it re-post it in one long segment?
All Comments (24)
-
Go look at molecular genealogy. You don't even need the fossil record for enough evidence to be convinced of evolution. Look at the geographic distribution of species. Look at the distribution of fossils in the sediment. It's quite obvious unless one is exceptionally deluded, like Hovind.
-
Don't you see the logic of it? The hind legs are small BECAUSE they don't need to walk no more - they swim.
So yeah, they don't walk. But their ancestors USED to walk.
And Hovind gave a bunch of fake rebutals, that any proper student of the respective field could see the flaws obviously.
-
they most certainly did!!! It was a commercial/market driven evolution, but they are still 'evolving'!
-
i certainly must have heard more than you, at the least, understood more. I don't know how you got from this debate to 'god is real, the bible is true'.... i assume you already believed that. regardless, kent hovind said a whole lot of nothing in all this!
-
Please explain how evolution could possibly be linked to Cell-phones dvrjosh.
Cell-phones obviously DID NOT evolve.
-
Name a '' rebutal '' that Shermer gave.
I obviously missed it.
Hovind gave a heap of 'rebutals' to evolution.
Whale's so called "hind legs" is one.
-
What a nasty piece of work you are resistanceunion.
Shame on you.
-
Yes I was, were you ?
-
... were you listening at all?!
-
Kent Hovind the only thing he can win now is a FIST in the EYE in JAIL he is in :D . The only thing bigger wean he gets out will be his anus.
f the only alternative is creation, then That makes evolution very true indeed, seeing as all Hovind's points are false. I don't think he said one thing where my brain didn't cringe at how bad his logic was
tommyk77 3 years ago 3
Yeah, that makes sense. If the only alternative is something you don't want, it must be true.
Saxking2005 3 years ago
Kent Hovind has produced too many falacious statements in this debate that it is hard to even taken him seriously any more.
He makes the claim that there is no evidence for biological evolution and abiogenesis because he knows that it is impossible for a evolutionary biologist to explain in 15minutes these two subjects.
Gwisss 3 years ago
I've listened for hours and haven't found anyone give a good theory.
Saxking2005 3 years ago
Then you've been brainwashed.
dvrjosh 3 years ago
That's what you say instead of GIVING an actual theory?
Saxking2005 3 years ago