MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 5.

"If you can't go somewhere because you will be dead, then you can't come back here and tell me you went there." - Ralph Rene, author of NASA Mooned America.
http://www.ralphrene.com

A long and thorough look at the #1 piece of evidence that the Apollo moon landings were faked: the deadly radiation encountered in cislunar space.

By far my biggest film yet! It's longer than even "MoonFaker Exhibit C" and "Flagging The Gems" back to back!

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• James
• Van
• Allen
• Hoften
• Ralph
• Rene
• Bill
• Kaysing
• solar
• flares
• GCR
• Galactic
• Cosmic
• Rays
• Radiation
• belts
• NOAA
• NASA
• CFI
• fake
• moon
• landing
• mission
• John
• H.
• Mauldin
• Prospects
• For
• Interstellar
• Travel
• 10GeV
• Protons
• Electrons
• Neutrons
• 2meter
• Shielding
• astronauts
• shuttle
• Neil
• Armstrong
• Buzz
• Aldrin
• David
• Groves
• Percy
• Marcus
• Space
• Station
• Jay
• Windley
• Jim
• Oberg
• Phil
• Plait
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[rm06c]

The inherent problem I see here is the misconception that lead is the only material that can provide protection from radiation.

Lead can be very good in blocking high-energy electro-magnetic waves, but it's not a good idea for electrons and protons.

Geiger counters measure gamma rays and beta particle radiation. Lead reduced the count because it blocked out the gamma rays, but a lot of secondary radiation was created due to its high density (FCC crystal structure).

[WhiteJarrah]

"The inherent problem I see here is the misconception that lead is the only material that can provide protection from radiation."

Where do I make that claim? Later in the videos I state that polyethylene and or water would do just the same.

"Lead can be very good in blocking high-energy electro-magnetic waves, but it's not a good idea for electrons and protons."

Actually, it offers the same protection as it's mass equivalent in water. Only lead is a lot less bulky than water.

[WhiteJarrah]

"Lead reduced the count because it blocked out the gamma rays, but a lot of secondary radiation was created due to its high density"

Aluminum would have worsened the problem. When they used it on the ISS it increased the radiation from 0.027rem/day to 0.1rem/day.

And when shielding on Van Allen's early Rockoons created x-rays due to all the electrons hitting the capsule.

[mujaku]

@BlisterHiker It is easy to take the blue pill, believing what the government tells us. Most crave consonance and don't like cognitive dissonance. I can well understand your need to remove or to try to reduce the dissonance. Attacking the messenger is one way of doing it. In the meantime pop another blue pill. Don't take the red one. The rabbit hole is deep.

[Tweekerhead]

@WhiteJarrah Wouldn't the exposure to cosmic rays be the same for the crews of the Shuttle ...ISS and the crew s of Apollo both being above the ozone layer?

[TheFireForEffect]

(w)(w)(w).telegraph.co.uk/scie­nce/space/8746306/Nasa-release­s-new-high-definition-images-o­f-Apollo-moon-landings.html

[Tweekerhead]

LOL...You idiots hold so precious the data brought back from a 31lb. satellite launched in 1958 over modern data & assessments of the Van Allen belts?

LOLOLOL Gawd you're stupid...

[datzfast]

@Blister Hiker none of the knowledge means anything if the missions were faked. the illusion of knowledge being just as dangerous as stupidity

[johnsenkenn]

@WhiteJarrah

There are no sound on part 3.

[bitterbonker]

Ralph Rene's book is an excellent, well-researched work. The best part is when he shows all the blatant inconsistencies between the accounts of the different "astro-nots" and NASA's statements. NASA is shown up to be the lying fool-asses they are. I love how much condescension there is for moon hoax "conspiracy theories" despite the vast, vast amount of credible scientific evidence that supports them.

[un4g1v3n1]

9:36

[BlisterHiker]

"If NASA went to the moon in 1969, why haven't they made it to MArs yet"

chumbawomba, try actually learning something about challenges of long-term missions in space.

Apollo missions lasted days. Mission to Mars will last about 3 years.

Realize the cost. Apollo program cost $25 billion in 60s/70s dollars. Do you have any idea how much a mission to Mars would cost?

There are still many things to learn before people embark on mission to Mars, including psychological side.

Learn the facts.

[BlisterHiker]

@cadu1995

Haven't seen any film debunking WhiteJarrah's garbage?

Have you actually watched anything that doesn't fit your fanatical faith in hoax?

Take a look at my videos. Take a look at videos from lukequixotesanjose, philwebb59, Astrobrant2, GoneToPlaid and others.

Each of these people has more knowledge of Space Exploration and science than WhiteJarrah could ever dream about!

In couple of my videos, I debunked WhiteJarrah's claims and put them to garbage, where they belong. Take a look.