Global Warming or Global Governance? (Full Length)

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Global-...
If you were to ask ten people on the street if mankind was causing global warming, at least eight out of ten would say yes. After all, Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth allegedly provides incontrovertible evidence that this is the case. Both presidential candidates are committed to passing economically devastating legislation that will do little to nothing to stop global warming. Contrary to what is heard in the media, however, there is overwhelming evidence that the warming we are experiencing is natural, with maybe a small amount contributed by man's activities. Nor is there any scientific consensus. 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating there is "no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide is causing...catastrophic" warming. The debate is still raging within the scientific community. In this DVD, Sovereignty International has put together interviews of respected climate scientists and biologists from numerous sources who explain, step by step, why Al Gore and the global warming alarmists are incorrect. In some cases, blatantly so.

The DVD also provides evidence that the global warming agenda is being funded with tens of billions of dollars as a mechanism to create global governance.Hear from congressmen, experts and even well-known news broadcasters how global governance puts global institutions, especially the United Nations (UN), that are not accountable to the American people in control of every aspect of our economy. The skyrocketing gas and food prices today are a direct result of this agenda.

• Category

  News & Politics

[93MegS]

My biggest criticism is the lack of mention of VARIATIONS in climate change globally. Climate change is changing the oceanic and atmospheric structures and organisations so that, for example, wet areas become wetter and dry areas become drier. Thus the effects are not balanced, and the impacts disproportionate. It's easy for us, in developed nations, to argue that getting warmer isn't a bad thing as we can ADAPT. The drought-stricken developing nations not so much...

[93MegS]

You should stop exerting your views when you have no scientific background whatsoever...

[93MegS]

The globe is complex. There has been model simulations that suggest that the reason for the recent decade-long stagnation in temperature rise is due to internal reorganisation of the oceanic heat storage reservoir. You're also ignoring the FEEDBACK of CO2, which was responsible for the Snowball Earth 165Ma and the last Ice Age. Temperature may come first sometimes, but CO2 feed backs into the atmosphere and exacerbates the warming or cooling

[93MegS]

It has been agreed that the MWP produced warm, most likely warmer, temperatures in the past, but in the NORTHERN HEMISPHERE. Currently, our global temperatures ARE greater than the global temperatures of the MWP.

[Will Hart]

"Ten independent studies that have confirmed the hockey stick." LOL These idiots use each other's data sets and there have been hundreds of papers by hundreds of researchers who have confirmed that the Medieval warm period was real, was global, and was significantly warmer than today. A localized event. The frigging Vikings stayed on Greenland for nearly 500 years for Christ sakes and the arctic ice cover was a fraction of what it is today.

[1000frolly]

1) Of course it does! How can you know the past or future anthropgenic, if you do not know the natural contribution?

2) No it isn't. Like all the IPCC basic premises on climate, they are simply assumed.

3) If you do not know how much of the rise in CO2 concentration is due to us, or how much of the warming is due to us either; how the hell can you estimate anything? It all complete psudo-scientific clap-trap.

[1000frolly]

So, after being proved completely wrong, you do not even have the decency to admit it. -Instead going off on a silly, childish Ad-Hominem rant.

Wonder why no-one is listening anymore to your alarmist fairy-tails?

[maunaowakea777]

Tripe is thinking this is a valid argument point when you apparently deny the anthropogenic cause of global warming against all the available credible science. You strike me as the kind of person who quits before he even starts to address a problem that is difficult. Kind of like a modern day Chamberlain. Capitulation to the oil and coal industry in this regard is a modern day Munich Agreement. Perhaps a wolf in sheeps clothing arguing against the defense of England during the blitz.

[1000frolly]

"U.S. still emits more CO2 than china".

I wonder where you are getting this tripe; Greenpeace, maybe?

.

CHINA 2011 = 9,072,000,000 tonnes

USA 2011 = 6,017,000,000 tonnes

.

The difference is even greater now.