Hitchens-Dembski Debate Nov 2010 (3 of 10)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
30,915
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 26, 2010

The Intellectually Dishonest Cowards at the Prestonwood Christian Academy are attempting to censor this debate off of youtube to cover up the embarrassing defeat of Dembski by Christopher Hitchens. Don't cave in to bullying and censorship, fight back!

  • likes, 47 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "My career went down the toilet and I can no longer get a job in the mainstream academic world." That should be a big red flag to anyone who takes this guy seriously.

  • INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS NOT SCIENCE

see all

All Comments (565)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What an intellectually dishonest person Demski is. Why would someone tell such out and out lies.

  • @12Ominous Yes, but when you say "proof of Jesus" do you mean proof of a historical figure, or proof of God becoming flesh, getting everything right, performing magic, etc.? We may have more "proof" of Jesus than Socrates, but with Socrates the question of his very existence does not matter. He didn't claim to be god (although neither did Jesus).

  • lol how is complexity a proof of God? I thought Ockham's Razor was pertruding for people like him? ffs...

  • As someone with a science background, I understand Dembski. Guess who has no chance of understanding what he says? High School Students. The dumbass is hamstringing his own arguments by talking over his audiences' level of comprehension.

  • Love the way that Demski's entire argument is attacking hitchins, where hitchins produces evidence.

  • ...so Dembski's argument against the FIRST life being incredibly simple is to point to the complexity of the MODERN eukaryotic cell? I am utterly speechless.

    Any biologist will tell you that the organelles of a eukaryotic cell are the result of simpler organisms having imbibed smaller cells in the ancient past and then divided with them.

    The first cell was essentially just a phospholipid membrane with some free-floating organic chemicals inside it.

  • "5 minutes of arguments for existence of a creator god and 10 minutes of arguments for its benevolence" turned out to be 15 minutes of whining about how Hitchens and the whole academia are unfair to him and stupid.

  • I get the impression of desperation in Dembski's words.... I get the feeling that he doesn't really believe his own words, but is sadly in a position of not knowing what else to do... the education system has deserted him: without hanging on to this Discovery Institution garbage.... he'd have nothing to do.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more