BODY BY SCIENCE VIDEO 10 THE BIG 5 WORKOUT Part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,345
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 6, 2009

In this third installment of the "Big 5" Workout series Dr. Doug McGuff demonstrates the remaining exercises of the "Big 5" workout as detailed in his book "Body By Science."

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Barney, you must be confused, these are not the Power Factor/Static Contraction videos.

  • One big problem for me: everyone I've seen do these Power Factor/Static/ Max Contraction routines in the last 10 years looks like they've never picked up a weight in their life. It may work for a cycle, but when the theory isn't yielding real-world results, it's time to reexamine your theory. And if you look like Barney Fife, then it ain't yielding results.

  • This is Mike Mentzer's program. I have used it in the past, adding a couple of excersises and shorter rest period. It does work. And it will kick you ass.

  • i have a question why start with legpress and not with shoulderpress, should we start with low body and then superior body or really doesnt matter.

    thank you

  • amazing if people can make gains, I think any eightlifting builds some muscle, so better than jogging garbage, and reduce calories for leanness

  • has anyone come across McGuff literature on the delayed onset of muscle soreness after the body by science workout?

  • guy looks like he never lifted a weight in his life

  • xanthromera - i don't think McGuff is trying to get big like some of the people he trains, he's in good shape and it impressive to see a Dr who puts his money where his mouth is, rather than writing a book about exercise or diet without actually doing it himself

  • I see your point that a minority of his movements are as little as 6 seconds, but more are 10 seconds or so.

    Average it out and it probably comes to 8-9 seconds, since some are over 10.

    Drew Baye's not that heavy either. I think HIT is time-efficient, but not ultimately as effective.

    However, it's more productive (results/time).

  • I stand corrected, by the clock some of his reps are down to 6 seconds, not 4 or 5.

    According to his first book all sets should be terminated 10 seconds after failing, that is after one fails, one should struggle on for a further 10 seconds. That is clearly not happening here.

    I am disappointed with the lack of intensity shown in these youtube clips after reading his book. Perhaps this is why the man is still lightly built after 10 years of bodybuilding.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more