9/11 WTC Employee Discusses pre 9/11 Power downs.

Gary Corbett , World Trade Center employee discusses the power down at the WTC the weekend before 9/11.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• world
• trade
• centre
• new
• york
• 9/11/2001
• 911
• power
• down
• security
• interview
• talking
• discussion
• talk
• hot topics
• commentary
• speech

[Jimserac]

Now THIS is astonishing in that we've heard tons of coverage for 10 years on the many aspects of the attack. I am not a conspiracy theorist but I think enough good people died so that it is OK if people raise questions from now till the end of time. And here we have this information that there was a major power outage for a significant amount of time, days before the attack. Maybe others of you who have followed this closer knew about this power outage.

[cappucinokid100]

@Jimserac See my upload 911 Truth The Elephant in the room.It contains an interview with a Scott Forbes,who worked at the WTC.He spent the weekend prior to 911 working to back up all his companies files due to this power down.

[cappucinokid100]

@Jimserac Watch the video response ,it has some info posted on there you may find interesting.

[itzahazylife]

@ModernPlague

And then assuming we did stage the attack on the WTC. Did the government really have to hire agents to go in and wire all of the beams with explosives in order to destroy the tower? And not just 1 tower, but BOTH? But the real question is COULD they have? Read my original comment at the top of the page.

[itzahazylife]

@ModernPlague

"And not only that, but *engage* in extreme overkill..."

[itzahazylife]

@ModernPlague

The Nixon administration couldn't even get away with Watergate, and yet the Bush administration would orchestrate an extremely risky inside job. And not only that, but enege in extreme overkill in the process? We marched into Korea. We marched into Vietnam. We marched into the Gulf during the Gulf war. Yet, this time, we needed something as drastic as 9/11 to go into Iraq? We couldn't have just staged a fake attack on one of our ships or something? lol

[itzahazylife]

@ModernPlague

Sure there are conspiracies. But, there are crazy conspiracies and there are rational ones. For example. A rational conspiracy is the military industrial complex. 9/11 is an example of a crazy one. To think the Bush Admin. risked destroying 4 planes full of people, hitting the Pentagon, destroying both towers, and possibly the White House or Capital building with flight 93, just so we could go into Iraq, is just ridiculous. They would have found another way. It's such overkill.

[itzahazylife]

Scott Forbes is the only one who claimed this. He even changed his stories. There's even photos of the WTC all lit up during the time when it was supposedly powered down. Then you have people saying that they removed all the bomb sniffing dogs from the WTC. That's also untrue. There were EXTRA dogs there that were removed on 9/6/01 after phony bomb threats. The security merely went back to normal with 2 dogs on site. They were both on site on 9/11 and the one named Sirius, died in the attack.

[pigeonpsycho]

brave man thanks for the info

[ModernPlague]

You hit the nail on the head regarding conspiracies, man.

People are charged with various forms of conspiracy every day, and serve time in jail for conspiring to rob, to deal drugs, etc.

But we're supposed to think that rich, powerful, well-connected people are the ones to never get together to hatch illegal plans?!

The American media has trained Americans to think "conspiracy" = "lunacy"

Americans are not supposed to look any deeper than the TV experts tell them to, and it often works.

[silvernail6]

@preparation88 I concur. Hope this fella doesn't get visited by the same people who "contacted" Barry Jennings.

[preparation88]

@Jimserac Why do you need to qualify your statement with "I am not a conspiracy theorist" ... more to the point, what is the definition? Think about it. Two hoods often conspire to rob a liquor store, but we are expected to believe that the more that is at stake, the richer and more powerful people get, the less likely they are to conspire. Why is that? People who get rich and elected really become saints or tend to do evil ALONE without cooperation from others? Astonishing & insulting term