9/11 TV Fakery: If it's on TV, then it must be true!

Would you believe that?...

1. Planes are made of light materials like aluminum and fiberglass. Think of them as long beer cans. Even birds can give planes problems.

2. There were many steel core columns supporting both of the Twin Towers. No plane could enter such a structure without being completely destroyed.

3. Two planes were depicted as being inside and intact the Twin Towers, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each.

4. Eyewitnesses: Very few people in New York's business district actually had a decent view of the South Tower of the WTC. Only a few thousand people at most would have been able to see the South Tower explode. The author of this website has interviewed people who do not believe that they saw a plane strike the South Tower.

Meanwhile, it was a simple matter for the TV networks to keep the eyewitnesses who didn't see a plane off the air.

5. Both Boeing 767s (i.e., Flights 11 and 175, which supposedly struck the North and South Towers respectively) have 165 foot wingspans. Meanwhile, both the North and South Towers were 210 feet wide. We're supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the tower they hit, with no pieces showing, with only 45 feet of room to spare!

6. United Airlines Flight 175 was shown entering the South Tower like a ghost. When the tip of the plane's fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

7. Newton's Third Law of Motion states that "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.". Let's apply Newton's Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11/01 story, Flight 175 strikes the the South Tower at 450 m.p.h.

Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower.

8. There was no audio of 'Flight 175' striking the South Tower. This is true even though there were about a dozen videos of the event said to be obtained from lucky amateurs.

9. There are innumerable contradictions with the news reports of planes striking the WTC. (The author's writing is here.) Just a cursory examination of the 911 news reports can reveal dramatic inconsistencies.

10. There has been massive censorship of the 911 Hoax. Dozens of media sources have exercized a zero tolerance policy for any suggestion that no planes struck the WTC before it was vaporized from exotic weaponry and nuclear weapons.

Why would CBS, The New York Times, The History Channel, Indmedia.org and YouTube.com be censoring the idea so aggressively if real planes hit the Twin Towers?

http://www.youtube.com/user/AnonymousTruther

911 tv fakery no planes CGI footage nwo new world order age illuminati 9/11 WTC twin towers simonshack alex jones jason burmas david griffin Pentagon fake war on terror freemason wwIII nufffrespect CFR david icke Skull Bones Bilderberg hoax scam exposed money banks september clues no plane missile bombs detonations WTC7 demolition Israel Jesuit Vatican Black Pope Bush Obama administration 9/11 coincidences media news mind control brainwash truth movement lies government propaganda psy-op black-op controlled opposition perps loose change image video manipulation jet nose in out frame ghostplane

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• tv
• fakery
• no
• planes
• CGI
• footage
• nwo
• new
• world
• order
• age
• illuminati
• 9/11
• WTC
• simonshack
• alex
• jones
• jason
• burmas
• david
• griffin
• Pentagon
• fake
• war
• on
• terror
• freemason
• wwIII
• nufffrespect
• CFR
• icke
• Skull
• Bones
• Bilderberg
• hoax
• editing
• credits
• weapons
• trailer
• video game
• cutscene
• handheld console

[casperislll]

You obviously don't understand how digital footage works, because you have those overlapping pixels regions going on all the time in actual footage. Especially in low res, compressed footage like you have here. It's kind of like natural anti-aliasing.

[roquefortfiles]

@wipemysmile Umm.. It flies through the building at full power.. That's how. Heavy jet going really really fast. It equals a hell of allot of force. Its hitting a building that is largely air. Think.. "Big empty box".

See for yourself.

watch?v=oSWjgqpxE3w&feature=re­lated

Oh.. BTW the fuselage segment is 30 stories in the air on the roof of another building.

Just like it was reported by a firm of architects along with multiple bodies.

(Seriously man.. Grow up get some smarts.)

[roquefortfiles]

@wsee CGI has been proven 100% for over five years. Really.. ?

We have friends in NY who witnessed this live.

You be smokin too much crack dude.

[roquefortfiles]

@wipemysmile Just curious.  What level education do you have?

[roquefortfiles]

@wipemysmile Open my perspective then dude!!!.. Tell us all how it went.

Come on. The floor is yours.

[roquefortfiles]

What points? I don't really get what you have so much difficulty understanding here. Unless of course you want to claim every single video taken of this is fake.. Which in itself is a ridiculous statement. I have friends in NY who watched this happen LIVE.

I think you been doing too much crack buddy. But that wouldn't surprise me. All you "TM" people are almost clones of each other. You're all stupid nuts.

Mention anything too difficult for them to understand and its.. SHILL!!

[roquefortfiles]

@wipemysmile What i am talking about has NOTHING to do with the "Official" story. It has to do with KNOWN facts. Unless you want to throw people like Dave Bottiglia (Air traffic Controller of U 175).. Under the buss. Which is ABSURD!!. These people are trained in their jobs. You think he suddenly has no clue what he is doing?? They tracked 175 all the way there. Dave was calling the altitudes as it descended. Guess what and where the next altitude was?

WTC 2

Don't be a fool

[wipemysmile]

@roquefortfiles Oh you finally decided to address one of the many points Ive raised although address probably isnt the proper word since you give it no thought other than to disagree. Again you are incapable of independent thinking. Youtube it and buzz off.

[roquefortfiles]

@wipemysmile Discrepancies between networks?!!!!!! (I used to work as a news shooter). This is a completely ridiculous statement!! For one thing no two cameras will be the same nor will the lenses used to shoot the images. And unless every single station is running time code on the day... NOTHING will be in synch. Which it wasn't. So it is a ridiculous thing to say.

You have no clue dude.. But you think you do which makes you TWICE as ignorant.

[wipemysmile]

@roquefortfiles Arguing with you is pointless because you are incapable of independent thought. That is whats required here. Not the bullshit information you try to hold over my head with your misguided arguments. You are still stuck on proving the same meaningless point backed only by supporters of the official story. Believe what you want but your perspective is greatly limited. Like I said we are done here.