LIGHT: DOES NOT MOVE!

You might think I lost my mind, but I can prove that light is actually a "stationary" observer. Its not "light" which moves through space, rather its "space" which moves via a light-second of time.

There is no such thing as "time" via light-second, light-minute, light-hour, light-day, light-month, and light-year. Its simply a "distance" not time. We define and calculate "time" via spatial dimensions in order to makes sense of our universe.

However, dimensions are an "illusion" which break down into a non-physical ( three-dimensional univserse.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• universe
• time
• big bang
• light
• lightyears
• physics
• cosmology
• quantum
• particles
• classical
• quantum mechanics
• singularity

[youVSmee]

The universe is not 13 billion light-years old, since a "light-year" is simply a a method to measure a "distance" not time.

Light is finite, yet it is described as being "constant",i.e. same speed.

In a vacuum, the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second . A light-second is a unit of "length." A light-year has nothing to do with "time" per se, its simply a method used to measure "distance."

So, if this measuring method breaks down to a 0 stationary state, then "light-years" =0.

[youVSmee]

Physical time does not exist, its simply a mathematical concept which allows us to create physical structures out of non-physical entities. Light is energy and this energy is a "probable wave."

Therefore, a wave and a particle are not really physical in nature. All physical matter breaks down into a two-dimensional vibrational string according to String Theory. The vibrating string inside the particle is composed of energy. This energy breaks down into a "probable wave."

[youVSmee]

What is required in order for energy ( probable waves ) to become physical mass? Ironically, the membrane of the particle equals a "potential" state, which has the "potential" to become a particle.

In order for this "potential" state to become a particle, it requires a "conscious" observer, which collapses a wave into a particle, according to the Double Slit experiments, the Copenhagens Interpretations and the Heisenburgs Uncertainty principle. If there is no conscious=no E= no mass = no BB.

[RaoulNeppar]

What must move in order to cause the appearance of motion? If you watch a recording on video tape you see a rapid succession of static frames, each slightly different than the previous one creating a flowing illusion. It is perception that races from one image to the next. Matter, energy, time, space, dimension, mass, velocity, direction; these are aspects of a perceived reality created as sparks of human awareness streak through a larger Medium, that which the Hermetists called the All.

[Barbitone]

I agree with this perspective. When we measure any kind of vibration external to us, I believe that we are actually measuring our observation -so we are measuring the feedback loop, boundary conditioning, relativity of our inside and our outside. When we see light (electromagnetism/white-whole) we are seeing the expansion of the space-time manifold and when we see darkness (gravitation/black-hole), we are seeing (measuring) the contraction of the space-time manifold...

[JDFolk1]

You are correct. Matter moves (vibrates). Light does not. It is no coincidence that matter nearing absolute zero begins to display strange behaviors in that it becomes sort of "here and there." Stretched out . However you want to describe it. We usually observe objects as though we were on the same vibrating string of a guitar, but when an object's vibration is slowed through temerature and we continue to move, it begins to display this behavior. To travel time, one must stop vibrating.